feat(test): Add cargo_test to test-support prelude #14243
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use |
rustbot
added
A-testing-cargo-itself
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #14245) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
We now include the prelude in so many places, this simplifies how we can present how `cargo-test-support` works. Yes, this included some `use` clean ups but its already painful enough walking through every test file, I didn't want to do it twice.
weihanglo
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2024
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Jul 13, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2024
Update cargo 31 commits in 154fdac39ae9629954e19e9986fd2cf2cdd8d964..a2b58c3dad4d554ba01ed6c45c41ff85390560f2 2024-07-07 01:28:23 +0000 to 2024-07-16 00:52:02 +0000 - chore(ci): bump CI tools (rust-lang/cargo#14257) - test: migrate fetch and list_availables to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14214) - chore: downgrade to jobserver@0.1.28 (rust-lang/cargo#14254) - perf(source): Don't `du` on every git source load (rust-lang/cargo#14252) - fix(source): Don't warn about unreferenced duplicate packages (rust-lang/cargo#14239) - feat(test): Add cargo_test to test-support prelude (rust-lang/cargo#14243) - Add workflow to publish Cargo automatically (rust-lang/cargo#14202) - test: migrate implicit_features to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14245) - test: migrate build-std/main to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14241) - test: migrate check_cfg to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14235) - refactor(source): More RecursivePathSource clean up (rust-lang/cargo#14231) - Add more profiling traces (rust-lang/cargo#14238) - fix(overrides): Don't warn on duplicate packages from using '..' (rust-lang/cargo#14234) - fix(test): Redact elapsed time in the minutes time frame (rust-lang/cargo#14233) - test: Migrate lto tests to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14209) - fix: Ensure dep/feature activates the dependency on 2024 (rust-lang/cargo#14221) - chore(docs): update index of reference (rust-lang/cargo#14228) - test: migrate test to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14226) - chore: remove duplicate words (rust-lang/cargo#14229) - docs(contrib): Document things I look for in RFCs (rust-lang/cargo#14222) - docs(ref): Note MSRV for features in the docs (rust-lang/cargo#14224) - test(progress): Resolve flakiness (rust-lang/cargo#14223) - fix(test): Reduce over-prescription to the caller (rust-lang/cargo#14217) - refactor: move get_source_id out of registry (rust-lang/cargo#14218) - fix: rename to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (rust-lang/cargo#14215) - test: migrate member_errors, multitarget and new to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14210) - test: migrate generate_lockfile and glob_targets to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14200) - test: Ensure --list test works with cargo-bloat (rust-lang/cargo#14213) - dont make new constant InternedString in hot path (rust-lang/cargo#14211) - Fix compatible_with_older_cargo test. (rust-lang/cargo#14212) - test: migrate metabuild, metadata and net_config to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14162)
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
fix(test): Move path2url to CargoPathExt::to_url ### What does this PR try to resolve? This is a small step, like #14243, to improve the clarity of `cargo-test-support`s API. Overall, I'm trying to make it more obvious on https://docs.rs/cargo-test-support/latest/cargo_test_support/ which items to reach for when. I figured this is one that could be demoted to `paths` When doing so, I noticed `CargoPathExt`. I figured if we had any extension traits for `Path`, then this is a reasonable one to add. ### How should we test and review this PR? ### Additional information
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
With where we are at with #14039, I was revisiting our test writing documentation. I was wanting to put more emphasis on rustdoc and found it would be helpful to talk about the concepts if a prelude was used instead of
extern crate.How should we test and review this PR?
Yes, this included some
useclean ups in tangentially-related commit but its already painful enoughwalking through every test file, I didn't want to do it twice.
Additional information