Unrolled build for rust-lang#126142

Rollup merge of rust-lang#126142 - compiler-errors:trait-ref-split, r=jackh726

Harmonize using root or leaf obligation in trait error reporting

When rust-lang#121826 changed the error reporting to use root obligation and not the leafmost obligation, it didn't actually make sure that all the other diagnostics helper functions used the right obligation.

Specifically, when reporting similar impl candidates we are looking for impls of the root obligation, but trying to match them against the trait ref of the leaf obligation.

This does a few other miscellaneous changes. There's a lot more clean-up that could be done here, but working with this code is really grief-inducing due to how messy it has become over the years. Someone really needs to show it love. 😓

r? ``@estebank``

Fixes rust-lang#126129

Author: rust-timer

compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/note_and_explain.rs

@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ impl<T> Trait<T> for X {
         for pred in hir_generics.bounds_for_param(def_id) {
             if self.constrain_generic_bound_associated_type_structured_suggestion(
                 diag,
-                &trait_ref,
+                trait_ref,
                 pred.bounds,
                 assoc,
                 assoc_args,
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ fn foo(&self) -> Self::T { String::new() }
 
             self.constrain_generic_bound_associated_type_structured_suggestion(
                 diag,
-                &trait_ref,
+                trait_ref,
                 opaque_hir_ty.bounds,
                 assoc,
                 assoc_args,
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ fn foo(&self) -> Self::T { String::new() }
     fn constrain_generic_bound_associated_type_structured_suggestion(
         &self,
         diag: &mut Diag<'_>,
-        trait_ref: &ty::TraitRef<'tcx>,
+        trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>,
         bounds: hir::GenericBounds<'_>,
         assoc: ty::AssocItem,
         assoc_args: &[ty::GenericArg<'tcx>],

compiler/rustc_infer/src/traits/util.rs

@@ -285,8 +285,7 @@ impl<'tcx, O: Elaboratable<'tcx>> Elaborator<'tcx, O> {
                 let obligations =
                     predicates.predicates.iter().enumerate().map(|(index, &(clause, span))| {
                         elaboratable.child_with_derived_cause(
-                            clause
-                                .instantiate_supertrait(tcx, &bound_clause.rebind(data.trait_ref)),
+                            clause.instantiate_supertrait(tcx, bound_clause.rebind(data.trait_ref)),
                             span,
                             bound_clause.rebind(data),
                             index,

compiler/rustc_middle/src/traits/util.rs

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Elaborator<'tcx> {
         let super_predicates =
             self.tcx.super_predicates_of(trait_ref.def_id()).predicates.iter().filter_map(
                 |&(pred, _)| {
-                    let clause = pred.instantiate_supertrait(self.tcx, &trait_ref);
+                    let clause = pred.instantiate_supertrait(self.tcx, trait_ref);
                     self.visited.insert(clause).then_some(clause)
                 },
             );

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/predicate.rs

@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Clause<'tcx> {
     pub fn instantiate_supertrait(
         self,
         tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
-        trait_ref: &ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
+        trait_ref: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
     ) -> Clause<'tcx> {
         // The interaction between HRTB and supertraits is not entirely
         // obvious. Let me walk you (and myself) through an example.

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/suggestions.rs

@@ -3597,7 +3597,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         &self,
         obligation: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
         err: &mut Diag<'_>,
-        trait_ref: &ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
+        trait_ref: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
     ) {
         let rhs_span = match obligation.cause.code() {
             ObligationCauseCode::BinOp { rhs_span: Some(span), rhs_is_lit, .. } if *rhs_is_lit => {
@@ -4592,7 +4592,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         &self,
         obligation: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
         err: &mut Diag<'_>,
-        trait_ref: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
+        trait_pred: ty::PolyTraitPredicate<'tcx>,
     ) {
         if ObligationCauseCode::QuestionMark != *obligation.cause.code().peel_derives() {
             return;
@@ -4602,10 +4602,9 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         if let hir::Node::Item(item) = node
             && let hir::ItemKind::Fn(sig, _, body_id) = item.kind
             && let hir::FnRetTy::DefaultReturn(ret_span) = sig.decl.output
-            && self.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::FromResidual, trait_ref.def_id())
-            && let ty::Tuple(l) = trait_ref.skip_binder().args.type_at(0).kind()
-            && l.len() == 0
-            && let ty::Adt(def, _) = trait_ref.skip_binder().args.type_at(1).kind()
+            && self.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::FromResidual, trait_pred.def_id())
+            && trait_pred.skip_binder().trait_ref.args.type_at(0).is_unit()
+            && let ty::Adt(def, _) = trait_pred.skip_binder().trait_ref.args.type_at(1).kind()
             && self.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::Result, def.did())
         {
             let body = self.tcx.hir().body(body_id);
@@ -4863,14 +4862,13 @@ impl<'a, 'hir> hir::intravisit::Visitor<'hir> for ReplaceImplTraitVisitor<'a> {
 pub(super) fn get_explanation_based_on_obligation<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     obligation: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
-    trait_ref: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
-    trait_predicate: &ty::PolyTraitPredicate<'tcx>,
+    trait_predicate: ty::PolyTraitPredicate<'tcx>,
     pre_message: String,
 ) -> String {
     if let ObligationCauseCode::MainFunctionType = obligation.cause.code() {
         "consider using `()`, or a `Result`".to_owned()
     } else {
-        let ty_desc = match trait_ref.skip_binder().self_ty().kind() {
+        let ty_desc = match trait_predicate.self_ty().skip_binder().kind() {
             ty::FnDef(_, _) => Some("fn item"),
             ty::Closure(_, _) => Some("closure"),
             _ => None,
@@ -4895,7 +4893,7 @@ pub(super) fn get_explanation_based_on_obligation<'tcx>(
             format!(
                 "{pre_message}the trait `{}` is not implemented for{desc} `{}`{post}",
                 trait_predicate.print_modifiers_and_trait_path(),
-                tcx.short_ty_string(trait_ref.skip_binder().self_ty(), &mut None),
+                tcx.short_ty_string(trait_predicate.self_ty().skip_binder(), &mut None),
             )
         } else {
             // "the trait bound `T: !Send` is not satisfied" reads better than "`!Send` is