Skip to content

Conversation

@cld-vasconcelos
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request fixes #190.

The issue has been successfully resolved based on the following implemented changes and their effects:

  1. A custom NamedUserManager was correctly implemented that filters users based on non-empty name_first and name_last fields using proper Django query filters (excluding null and empty strings).

  2. The manager was properly added to the User model as named_users while preserving the default objects manager, allowing both filtering methods to coexist without interference.

  3. Comprehensive tests were added that:

    • Verify the named_users manager correctly returns only users with both names populated (test_named_users_manager)
    • Confirm the default manager still returns all users (test_default_manager_unchanged)
    • Include test cases for all relevant scenarios (null names, empty strings, populated names)
  4. The implementation follows Django best practices by:

    • Properly extending models.Manager
    • Using appropriate query filtering (models.Q objects)
    • Maintaining existing functionality while adding new features

The changes directly address all requirements from the issue description and the tests demonstrate that both the new functionality works as intended and existing functionality remains unchanged. The code is properly structured and follows Django conventions for custom managers.

Automatic fix generated by OpenHands 🙌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Claude] User model custom manager

3 participants