Release v3.5.0 #2043
Merged
Release v3.5.0 #2043
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ydah
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2025
koic
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2025
Member
koic
left a comment
koic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for preparing the release. I have tested the plugin-supported RuboCop RSpec in several repositories and have not found any issues.
Collaborator
Author
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes in this release:
RSpec/PredicateMatcherreplacerespond_to?with two arguments with the RSpecrespond_tomatcher. (@bquorning)RSpec/PredicateMatchersupport foreqlandequalmatchers. (@bquorning)Full diff: v3.4.0...release
Also, we now have 100% code and branch coverage – thank you to @corsonknowles for helping and pushing for this change 🎉