-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add is_expected
for expect-based one-liner syntax.
#1180
Conversation
Whilst I'm a 👍 on this, didn't we debate not doing this :P |
LGTM though. |
We discussed it. I see enough questions/comments from users indicating confusion over |
I think I'll backport this to 2.99 so that it can be available for transpec to convert during the upgrade process. Gonne leave it open until I have that PR ready so I don't forget. |
Yeah given the number of "whats the expect equivalent of" I think it's worth while. I and @mootpointer were discussing doing this ages ago but never got around to it so 👍 :) |
Add `is_expected` for expect-based one-liner syntax.
I thought this was what we were moving to |
No thats |
Right... |
No description provided.