Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for overlapping fields #120

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2022
Merged

Check for overlapping fields #120

merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2022

Conversation

pavelkryukov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #120 (2338d86) into master (301686e) will decrease coverage by 0.25%.
The diff coverage is 71.42%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #120      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.77%   93.51%   -0.26%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         610      617       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits          572      577       +5     
- Misses         38       40       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
parse.py 90.90% <71.42%> (-0.32%) ⬇️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@aswaterman
Copy link
Member

OK with you, @neelgala?

@neelgala
Copy link
Collaborator

@pavelkryukov can you explain the corner case that this PR will catch with an example ?

@pavelkryukov
Copy link
Contributor Author

pavelkryukov commented May 17, 2022

jol rd rs1 jimm20 6..2=0x1b 1..0=3.

Here rs1 and jimm20 overlap and create ambiguity, I have a disabled unit test for that in #119

@neelgala
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM - @aswaterman please merge

@neelgala neelgala mentioned this pull request May 18, 2022
@aswaterman
Copy link
Member

yessir

@aswaterman aswaterman merged commit 2415a34 into riscv:master May 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants