Skip to content

Conversation

@gabrielmfern
Copy link
Member

@gabrielmfern gabrielmfern commented Nov 6, 2025

I've seen people confuse the full time shown in the console for the preview server with the actual time it will take to render their email templates, but the time there also includes the time to bundle the email template, which we do with esbuild. This pull request shows them separately so that it's clearer what is what, but we don't omit any time

It now looks like this:

image

@gabrielmfern gabrielmfern self-assigned this Nov 6, 2025
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 6, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 077f505

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages
Name Type
@react-email/preview-server Patch
react-email Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
react-email Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 6, 2025 11:56am
react-email-demo Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 6, 2025 11:56am

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/resend/react-email/@react-email/preview-server@2645

commit: 077f505

Copy link
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

@gabrielmfern gabrielmfern merged commit f43f1ce into canary Nov 6, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@gabrielmfern gabrielmfern deleted the feat/separate-timings-for-render-build branch November 6, 2025 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants