Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(manager/flux): support chartRef in HelmRelease resources #31962

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ssams
Copy link

@ssams ssams commented Oct 15, 2024

Changes

Adds support for chartRef fields within HelmRelease resources in the flux manager, as described in #31945.

Context

Closes #31945

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

lib/modules/manager/flux/extract.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/modules/manager/flux/extract.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/modules/manager/flux/extract.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you join both fixtures and inline them to test? or will it cause code coverage issues?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could be also inlined in most tests, but they are also used in one test for extractAllPackageFiles, where file paths are currently expected in the results (https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/pull/31962/files#diff-e4fcec4565b58234272751cf6a22e089c6e13b651bb297b4db19834442b124e1R960-R961).

quick search shows that this seems to be related to #19056, similar situation as in the referenced discussion/comments there?

@ssams ssams requested a review from viceice October 16, 2024 07:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants