Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: test #531

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

feat: test #531

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

crazyair
Copy link
Contributor

@crazyair crazyair commented Sep 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 测试
    • 增强了对 Cascader.Search 组件的测试用例,特别是在选择多个选项时的 onChange 事件验证。
    • 新增测试用例以确保在不使用 changeOnSelect 的情况下,正确触发 onChange 函数。

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
cascader ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 2, 2024 10:03am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Walkthrough

此次更改涉及对 Cascader.Search 组件的测试用例进行修改,主要增强了对 changeOnSelectmultiple 属性下 onChange 事件的验证。原有测试用例被重命名以明确其功能,并新增了在未启用 changeOnSelect 的多选场景下的测试用例,以确保 onChange 函数的正确触发。

Changes

文件 更改摘要
tests/search.spec.tsx 修改了测试用例以增强对 Cascader.Search 组件的覆盖,重命名原有测试并新增多选场景的测试用例。

Poem

在草地上跳跃的小兔子,
新测试如春风轻拂,
选择多样乐无穷,
变化中欢声笑语,
组件更强,心欢喜,
让我们一起庆祝这美好时刻! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.67%. Comparing base (62bbe3c) to head (aeb80ab).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #531   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.67%   99.67%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines         609      609           
  Branches      184      175    -9     
=======================================
  Hits          607      607           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/search.spec.tsx (1)

215-230: 新测试用例:验证 multiple 情况下的 onChange 行为

这个测试用例验证了在只启用 multiple 选项(不启用 changeOnSelect)时 onChange 函数的行为。测试步骤和预期结果与前一个测试用例相似。

建议:

  1. 考虑添加一个断言,验证在不启用 changeOnSelect 的情况下,选择父节点时不会触发 onChange
  2. 测试在多选模式下取消选中某个选项的行为
  3. 验证在多选模式下,选择全部子节点时父节点是否被自动选中

可以考虑将两个测试用例中的重复代码提取为一个辅助函数,以提高代码的可维护性。

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62bbe3c and aeb80ab.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/search.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
tests/search.spec.tsx (2)

Line range hint 196-214: 新测试用例:验证 changeOnSelect + multiple 情况下的 onChange 行为

这个测试用例正确地验证了在启用 changeOnSelectmultiple 选项时 onChange 函数的行为。测试覆盖了以下方面:

  1. 搜索并选择一个选项
  2. 验证 onChange 被正确调用,包括选中项的值
  3. 搜索并选择另一个选项
  4. 再次验证 onChange 被正确调用,包括两个选中项的值

建议:考虑添加以下场景的测试:

  1. 选择一个已选中的选项,验证其是否被取消选中
  2. 测试选择父节点时的行为

Line range hint 196-230: 总体评价:测试用例的改进

这些新增的测试用例显著提高了 Cascader.Search 组件的测试覆盖率,特别是在 changeOnSelectmultiple 选项组合使用时的 onChange 行为。这些测试有助于确保组件在不同配置下的正确性。

建议进一步改进:

  1. 考虑测试更多边缘情况,如选择/取消选择父节点、全选子节点等
  2. 提取公共代码到辅助函数,以提高可维护性
  3. 添加对搜索功能本身的更多测试,如空搜索结果、特殊字符搜索等

总的来说,这些新增测试是一个很好的改进,为组件的稳定性提供了更好的保障。

@zombieJ zombieJ merged commit 52b81ad into react-component:master Sep 2, 2024
10 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2024
lihongxiangfrontend pushed a commit to lihongxiangfrontend/cascader that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2024
* feat: test

* feat: test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants