-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: test #531
feat: test #531
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Walkthrough此次更改涉及对 Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #531 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.67% 99.67%
=======================================
Files 23 23
Lines 609 609
Branches 184 175 -9
=======================================
Hits 607 607
Misses 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/search.spec.tsx (1)
215-230
: 新测试用例:验证 multiple 情况下的 onChange 行为这个测试用例验证了在只启用
multiple
选项(不启用changeOnSelect
)时onChange
函数的行为。测试步骤和预期结果与前一个测试用例相似。建议:
- 考虑添加一个断言,验证在不启用
changeOnSelect
的情况下,选择父节点时不会触发onChange
- 测试在多选模式下取消选中某个选项的行为
- 验证在多选模式下,选择全部子节点时父节点是否被自动选中
可以考虑将两个测试用例中的重复代码提取为一个辅助函数,以提高代码的可维护性。
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/search.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
tests/search.spec.tsx (2)
Line range hint
196-214
: 新测试用例:验证 changeOnSelect + multiple 情况下的 onChange 行为这个测试用例正确地验证了在启用
changeOnSelect
和multiple
选项时onChange
函数的行为。测试覆盖了以下方面:
- 搜索并选择一个选项
- 验证
onChange
被正确调用,包括选中项的值- 搜索并选择另一个选项
- 再次验证
onChange
被正确调用,包括两个选中项的值建议:考虑添加以下场景的测试:
- 选择一个已选中的选项,验证其是否被取消选中
- 测试选择父节点时的行为
Line range hint
196-230
: 总体评价:测试用例的改进这些新增的测试用例显著提高了
Cascader.Search
组件的测试覆盖率,特别是在changeOnSelect
和multiple
选项组合使用时的onChange
行为。这些测试有助于确保组件在不同配置下的正确性。建议进一步改进:
- 考虑测试更多边缘情况,如选择/取消选择父节点、全选子节点等
- 提取公共代码到辅助函数,以提高可维护性
- 添加对搜索功能本身的更多测试,如空搜索结果、特殊字符搜索等
总的来说,这些新增测试是一个很好的改进,为组件的稳定性提供了更好的保障。
* feat: test * feat: test
Summary by CodeRabbit
Cascader.Search
组件的测试用例,特别是在选择多个选项时的onChange
事件验证。changeOnSelect
的情况下,正确触发onChange
函数。