Confusion on page 423 #119
baifanhorst
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
I tried several times. The model in the book could give the described accuracy, but not always. There is some stochasticity in the result. Not a big issue, though. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
At the bottom of this page, it says that the model has 100% accuracy on the training set, and 95% accuracy on the validation set. However, the left panel of Fig13.4 shows that the model's accuracy on the training set is about 90% and 85% on the validation set. So there is a discrepency between the figure and the description in the text.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions