Adapt to Angular renaming

[SethDavenport]

How do we want to deal with the whole Angular2 -> Angular, Angular1 -> AngularJS thing?

[ShaunEvening]

In the book we referred to 1.x as AngularJS and >=2 as Angular. When comparing the two we use specific version numbers to avoid confusion. It seems like the rangle-starter repo does a pretty good job of this already.

Perhaps renaming some of the angular2-* repos to angular-* in preparation for the release of ng4 in march would be a good idea?

[SethDavenport]

Sure

I guess there are two things two consider:

• how we call things in docs
• the actual repo names.

For docs, what we've been doing in the gitbook seems reasonable. I've done something similar in the angular-redux docs (Angular 1.x, Angular 2+).

Don't think that will work for repo names though. In which case I'm thinking:

angular-redux-example -> angular1-redux-example
angular2-redux-example -> angular-redux-example

However that involves 'recycling' a name which will probably confuse github a lot. So I'd love to hear some suggestions :)