You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
multiaddr define composable and future-proof network addresses.
Addressing a specific commit could look like this /git/5a179104a6f9e9a2c95562496c88bf514871a1d3
i came up with the idea that git could be added as a content addressed protocol, where you specify the Sha256 of the commit you want to fetch,
and radicle might be the perfect backend to support this multiaddr format.
As far i understand, it is already possible with radicle to fetch a git repo with only specifying the Sha256, without knowing the repository name. it that true ?
How do you guys handle the existing Sha-1 collisions ?
Hey, sorry about the delay in response. The radicle-git isn't for the protocol so I put it on the long finger to respond. The home for the protocol issues is at the heartwood repository. But you'd have to start using Radicle to contribute, unfortunately :P
I'll answer some of your questions here, and I'll also x-post the issue to the heartwood repo to get more eyes on it.
As far i understand, it is already possible with radicle to fetch a git repo with only specifying the Sha256, without knowing the repository name. it that true ?
How do you guys handle the existing Sha-1 collisions ?
A Radicle repository is identified by it's Repository ID (RID), which is indeed the SHA of it's initial metadata. The human-readable name is just there for metadata. Git uses Hardened SHA-1, which I believe results in less collisions (don't have a reference for this though).
any thoughts ?
How mature is multiaddr? It seems like it's still very much a WIP and Radicle is already experimental enough as it is -- spending all our RnD points 😄
multiaddr define composable and future-proof network addresses.
Addressing a specific commit could look like this
/git/5a179104a6f9e9a2c95562496c88bf514871a1d3
i came up with the idea that
git
could be added as a content addressed protocol, where you specify the Sha256 of the commit you want to fetch,and radicle might be the perfect backend to support this multiaddr format.
As far i understand, it is already possible with radicle to fetch a git repo with only specifying the Sha256, without knowing the repository name. it that true ?
How do you guys handle the existing Sha-1 collisions ?
more about:
multiformats/multiaddr#169
any thoughts ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: