Substitute symbol addrs more correctly

[montekki]

if a hexadecimal address has a suffix (say, "0xbeef:16") it won't be substituted with symbol name:

[radare]

How to differentiate to segmented x86 addressing?

[montekki]

look at the binary's arch?

[radare]

i would prefer to be arch-independent, if a human can understand the disasm, a parser should too..

On 11 Mar 2014, at 08:27, Fedor Sakharov notifications@github.com wrote:

look at the binary's arch?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[radare]

ping @montekki can you send a pr for that? checking for arch can be a dirty but working solution, so having this done with a couple of tests would be good for me

[radare]

also we can differentiate if the number starts with # instead of just 0x and if it contains :

[radare]

anyone?

[Maijin]

Can we have test-case or something to reproduce this 0xXXX:16 syntax ?

[radare]

from me?

…

On 19 Feb 2017, at 19:49, Maijin ***@***.***> wrote: Can we have test-case or something to reproduce this 0xXXX:16 syntax ?

[Maijin]

Whoever got something to reproduce

[trufae]

Without a test case this issue is quite difficult to handle/understand/fix.