Rethink r2 pipes

[XVilka]

Support more advanced ways of piping, a la PowerShell or https://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2012/08/10/rethinking-the-shell-pipeline/. See also https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/learn/understanding-the-powershell-pipeline?view=powershell-6

Idea is to pass JSON "objects" in some pipe cases without the hassle of handling them manually. We should make it a first-class citizen.

[radare]

We can implement the { command for this

…

On 8 Nov 2019, at 06:29, Anton Kochkov ***@***.***> wrote:  Support more advanced ways of piping, a la PowerShell or https://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2012/08/10/rethinking-the-shell-pipeline/. See also https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/learn/understanding-the-powershell-pipeline?view=powershell-6 Idea is to pass JSON "objects" in some pipe cases without the hassle of handling them manually. We should make it a first-class citizen. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[XVilka]

I propose a better one: |>, not a problem with the upcoming proper parser anyway.

[radare]

Wat

…

On 8 Nov 2019, at 09:26, Anton Kochkov ***@***.***> wrote:  I propose a better one: |>, not a problem with the upcoming proper parser anyway. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[ret2libc]

Nice-to-have feature, not a priority for me at the moment.