Native apps throw a warning now that `quarkus.uuid` is lazily produced

[zakkak]

Describe the bug

Since #45434 native executables throw the following warning:

2025-01-10 11:23:51,956 WARN  [io.qua.config] (main) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.uuid" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or that you did not make a typo

Expected behavior

Native apps should not throw any warnings like they do not in JVM-mode.

Actual behavior

Native executables throw the following warning:

2025-01-10 11:23:51,956 WARN  [io.qua.config] (main) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.uuid" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or that you did not make a typo

How to Reproduce?

./mvnw -Dnative -pl integration-tests/picocli-native -Dnative.surefire.skip -Dformat.skip -Dno-descriptor-tests clean package
./integration-tests/picocli-native/target/quarkus-integration-test-picocli-native-999-SNAPSHOT-runner quarkus

Output of uname -a or ver

No response

Output of java -version

No response

Mandrel or GraalVM version (if different from Java)

No response

Quarkus version or git rev

No response

Build tool (ie. output of mvnw --version or gradlew --version)

No response

Additional information

No response

[quarkus-bot]

/cc @Karm (native-image), @galderz (native-image)

[zakkak]

@geoand while at it you might want to apply the following patch as well:

diff --git a/core/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/runtime/configuration/RuntimeConfigBuilder.java b/core/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/runtime/configuration/RuntimeConfigBuilder.java
index 5c425918ada..ae3fb083cdc 100644
--- a/core/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/runtime/configuration/RuntimeConfigBuilder.java
+++ b/core/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/runtime/configuration/RuntimeConfigBuilder.java
@@ -29,16 +29,14 @@ public int priority() {
 
     private static class UuiConfigSource implements ConfigSource {
 
-        private static final String QUARKUS_UUID = "quarkus.uuid";
-
         @Override
         public Set<String> getPropertyNames() {
-            return Set.of(QUARKUS_UUID);
+            return Set.of(ConfigUtils.UUID_KEY);
         }
 
         @Override
         public String getValue(String propertyName) {
-            if (propertyName.equals(QUARKUS_UUID)) {
+            if (propertyName.equals(ConfigUtils.UUID_KEY)) {
                 return Holder.UUID_VALUE;
             }
             return null;

[geoand]

@radcortez what do we need to generate to remove the warning?
Should I bring back

suppressNonRuntimeConfigChanged.produce(new SuppressNonRuntimeConfigChangedWarningBuildItem("quarkus.uuid"));

?

[radcortez]

Hum... actually, I don't think we have a build step to ignore the warning. That one is to ignore when something changes from build time to runtime (recorded), like the profile.

The only quick option that I can see is to hardcode it here:

quarkus/core/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/runtime/configuration/ConfigDiagnostic.java

Lines 93 to 143 in f79ab9a

	public static void unknownProperties(Set<String> properties) {
	if (properties.isEmpty()) {
	return;
	}
	SmallRyeConfig config = ConfigProvider.getConfig().unwrap(SmallRyeConfig.class);
	Set<String> usedProperties = new HashSet<>();
	StringBuilder tmp = null;
	for (String property : config.getPropertyNames()) {
	if (properties.contains(property)) {
	continue;
	}
	if (tmp == null) {
	tmp = new StringBuilder(property.length());
	} else {
	tmp.setLength(0);
	}
	String usedProperty = StringUtil.replaceNonAlphanumericByUnderscores(property, tmp);
	if (properties.contains(usedProperty)) {
	continue;
	}
	usedProperties.add(usedProperty);
	}
	for (String property : properties) {
	// Indexed properties not supported by @ConfigRoot, but they can show up due to the YAML source. Just ignore them.
	if (property.indexOf('[') != -1 && property.indexOf(']') != -1) {
	continue;
	}
	boolean found = false;
	if (!usedProperties.isEmpty()) {
	if (tmp == null) {
	tmp = new StringBuilder(property.length());
	} else {
	tmp.setLength(0);
	}
	String propertyWithUnderscores = StringUtil.replaceNonAlphanumericByUnderscores(property, tmp);
	for (String usedProperty : usedProperties) {
	if (usedProperty.equalsIgnoreCase(propertyWithUnderscores)) {
	found = true;
	break;
	}
	}
	}
	if (!found) {
	ConfigValue configValue = config.getConfigValue(property);
	if (property.equals(configValue.getName())) {
	unknown(property);
	}
	}
	}
	}

[gsmet]

What exactly sets the quarkus.uuid value? Because somehow something is complaining that it's being set and not part of the mapping?

[geoand]

Right, I didn't expect to have this warning

[radcortez]

It was removed from the mapping https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/45434/files#r1906838929 :)

Actually, I think we can get away with it by removing it from the list of property names:
https://github.com/geoand/quarkus/blob/8a1ab70291b67ce2134299d28cf2227d9910e219/core/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/runtime/configuration/RuntimeConfigBuilder.java#L36

The list of unknowns is generated by matching the list of all properties to the ones declared in either mappings or roots.

It could still happen if someone overrides the value.

[radcortez]

Right, I didn't expect to have this warning

It is expected, because we validate that all provided configuration in the quarkus namespace requires a mapping or root declaration.

[geoand]

So @radcortez I'll leave this to you :)

[radcortez]

Sure.