-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
Fix qiita all tests #1107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ElDeveloper
merged 14 commits into
qiita-spots:relax-md-req
from
josenavas:fix-qiita-ware-tests
Apr 29, 2015
Merged
Fix qiita all tests #1107
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e75c372
Fixing qiita ware test util
josenavas fa4a68b
Fixing qiita ware tests
josenavas 658a5b5
Merge branch 'fix-analysis-tests' into fix-qiita-ware-tests
josenavas 157b60a
Adding qiime-map property to the prep template
josenavas a663d33
Merge branch 'relax-md-req' of https://github.com/biocore/qiita into …
josenavas b19b60c
Merge branch 'relax-md-req' of https://github.com/biocore/qiita into …
josenavas e7363a3
Merge branch 'add-qiime-map-func' into fix-qiita-ware-tests
josenavas d464237
Fixing bug in add filepath
josenavas 84beb81
Fixing _get_qiime_minimal_mapping
josenavas c30dd8c
Fixing qiime map parsing
josenavas e5ae3e4
Removing warnings from tests:
josenavas 14b0c49
Addressing comments
josenavas 0c9a47a
Adding test with reverse linker primer
josenavas 6c83ba4
Fixing WTF failures
josenavas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't recall from the stack of pull requests that have been coming in, but there are tests for both of these branches? i.e. cases with run_prefix and cases without it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, there was not. Adding right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thanks!
On (Apr-28-15|17:16), josenavas wrote: