Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which paper is torchvision.ops.deform_conv2d from? #3233

Closed
songyuc opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Which paper is torchvision.ops.deform_conv2d from? #3233

songyuc opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@songyuc
Copy link

songyuc commented Jan 8, 2021

📚 Documentation

I want to know which paper torchvision.ops.deform_conv2d is from, is it DCNv1 or DCNv2?

@datumbox
Copy link
Contributor

datumbox commented Jan 8, 2021

@songyuc On latest master both! Check out this one:

Performs Deformable Convolution v2, described in
`Deformable ConvNets v2: More Deformable, Better Results
<https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11168>`__ if :attr:`mask` is not ``None`` and
Performs Deformable Convolution, described in
`Deformable Convolutional Networks
<https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06211>`__ if :attr:`mask` is ``None``.

The v2 version was added recently.

@songyuc
Copy link
Author

songyuc commented Jan 8, 2021

@datumbox , is there an implementation of DCNv2 using this op?

@datumbox
Copy link
Contributor

datumbox commented Jan 8, 2021

Unfortunately we don't have an implementation of the DCNv2 network at TorchVision at the moment.

BTW feel free to reopen the ticket if you feel I closed it prematurely. :)

@songyuc
Copy link
Author

songyuc commented Jan 8, 2021

@datumbox , do you have a plan to add it in torchvision?

@datumbox
Copy link
Contributor

datumbox commented Jan 8, 2021

We don't have immediate plans but it's worth adding it to this ticket #2707 where we keep track requests. Or you can raise a separate issue to propose its addition. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants