Skip to content

Reapply "Depend on extension/threadpool, not thread_parallel_interface, in buck (#9511)" #9890

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Apr 3, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Trying again with internal fixes. Original summary:

I planned to do this everywhere and forgot. Clean it all up, leave a
note, enforce the note with visibility. This makes sure everything in
buck-land gets ET_USE_THREADPOOL.

Differential Revision: D72090889

…e, in buck (#9511)"

Trying again with internal fixes. Original summary:

I planned to do this everywhere and forgot. Clean it all up, leave a
note, enforce the note with visibility. This makes sure everything in
buck-land gets ET_USE_THREADPOOL.

Differential Revision: [D72090889](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D72090889/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
…e, in buck (#9511)"

Trying again with internal fixes. Original summary:

I planned to do this everywhere and forgot. Clean it all up, leave a
note, enforce the note with visibility. This makes sure everything in
buck-land gets ET_USE_THREADPOOL.

Differential Revision: [D72090889](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D72090889/)

ghstack-source-id: 276012372
Pull Request resolved: #9890
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 3, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9890

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit e8cf7e3 with merge base 8606725 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 3, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72090889

…adpool, not thread_parallel_interface, in buck (#9511)""

Trying again with internal fixes. Original summary:

I planned to do this everywhere and forgot. Clean it all up, leave a
note, enforce the note with visibility. This makes sure everything in
buck-land gets ET_USE_THREADPOOL.

Differential Revision: [D72090889](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D72090889/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
…e, in buck (#9511)"

Pull Request resolved: #9890

Trying again with internal fixes. Original summary:

I planned to do this everywhere and forgot. Clean it all up, leave a
note, enforce the note with visibility. This makes sure everything in
buck-land gets ET_USE_THREADPOOL.

Differential Revision: [D72090889](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D72090889/)
ghstack-source-id: 276017129
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72090889

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit a76f10c into gh/swolchok/421/base Apr 4, 2025
83 of 85 checks passed
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/swolchok/421/head branch April 4, 2025 21:04
@kirklandsign
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure why the bot failed to CP to main. https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/actions/runs/14274145415/job/40013784902 I will look into this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants