Skip to content

Add portable ELU implementation + test #9520

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025
Merged

Add portable ELU implementation + test #9520

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Mar 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

No description provided.

@swolchok
Update
e9a4489 
[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

swolchok commented Mar 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

@pytorch-bot PyTorch Bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9520

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd30cfa with merge base c43d5ad (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 22, 2025
@swolchok swolchok mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2025
Merged
@swolchok swolchok requested a review from kimishpatel March 22, 2025 00:30
@swolchok swolchok added the release notes: ops & kernels Changes to the opset and any new / changed kernel implementations label Mar 22, 2025
@kimishpatel
Copy link
Contributor

did we actually decide to make it a portable op @larryliu0820? If we just want to control its decomp behavior we have other ways to do it as well, right?

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

did we actually decide to make it a portable op @larryliu0820? If we just want to control its decomp behavior we have other ways to do it as well, right?

Do we not need portable op implementations for all core ATen ops?

@kimishpatel
Copy link
Contributor

did we actually decide to make it a portable op @larryliu0820? If we just want to control its decomp behavior we have other ways to do it as well, right?

Do we not need portable op implementations for all core ATen ops?

Sorry I should have been more clear. I was actually asking "did we actually decide to it a core aten op?". If so yes

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

core aten op

@kimishpatel pytorch/pytorch#149684

@swolchok
Update
2ff82d7 
[ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced Mar 25, 2025
Merged
Merged
@swolchok
Update
aafeb54 
[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping reviewers @manuelcandales @kimishpatel

@swolchok
Update
dd30cfa 
[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok swolchok merged commit 751e646 into main Mar 26, 2025
81 checks passed
@swolchok swolchok deleted the gh/swolchok/390/head branch March 26, 2025 20:26
kirklandsign pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
@swolchok @kirklandsign
Add portable ELU implementation + test (#9520)
f2fae59
kedarnath03 pushed a commit to kedarnath03/executorch that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
@swolchok
Add portable ELU implementation + test
cc4ebd4 
ghstack-source-id: 542b906
ghstack-comment-id: 2744722038
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/executorch#9520
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@manuelcandales manuelcandales manuelcandales approved these changes

@kimishpatel kimishpatel Awaiting requested review from kimishpatel

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: ops & kernels Changes to the opset and any new / changed kernel implementations
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@swolchok @kimishpatel @manuelcandales @facebook-github-bot