Skip to content

[ExecuTorch][XNNPACK] Rename linear weight partitioning flag for clarity #8928

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #8892 by @digantdesai
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/digantdesai/20/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/digantdesai/20/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/digantdesai/19/orig
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/digantdesai/20/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

YufengShi-dudu and others added 17 commits March 3, 2025 15:33
The second method overloading of to_backend() has the wrong signature
in docstring

Signed-off-by: Yufeng Shi <yufeng.shi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Lundell <adrian.lundell@arm.com>
Address various warnings as errors (#8581)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #8581

Some projects uses more restrictive build options than currently used in ET CI.

This means we encountered a number of errors when enabling for a microcontroller.

Reviewed By: digantdesai, swolchok

Differential Revision: D69139962
Differential Revision: D70261352

Pull Request resolved: #8837
This file clearly imports executorch.exir._warnings and thus it should have the dep.

Differential Revision: [D70451304](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D70451304/)

ghstack-source-id: 269199558
Pull Request resolved: #8871

Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <swolchok@meta.com>
Add basic performance metrics to native llama runner
* Add editable mode in Building from source file

* Update using-executorch-building-from-source.md
Differential Revision: D70409078

Pull Request resolved: #8850
Differential Revision: D70498387

Pull Request resolved: #8886
* replace fetcher

* replace fetcher

* replace fetcher

* replace fetcher

* replace fetcher

* replace fetcher
Differential Revision: D70503708

Pull Request resolved: #8888
Differential Revision: D70528853

Pull Request resolved: #8908
Differential Revision: D70538475

Pull Request resolved: #8918
This is not supported, so we shouldn't partition it.

Add an expectedFailure test to indicate that this is not supported

Differential Revision: [D70343584](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D70343584/)

ghstack-source-id: 269599294
Pull Request resolved: #8926
Pull Request resolved: #8892

Differential Revision: [D70372220](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D70372220/)
ghstack-source-id: 269599293
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8928

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 20a3ba8 with merge base 2ee3ffa (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.