Skip to content

[ET-VK][8/n] Unsqueeze #3172

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

yipjustin
Copy link
Contributor

@yipjustin yipjustin commented Apr 19, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.

torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3))

This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the unsqueeze operation to achieve a no-op unsqueeze(0) and then apply a permute.

Differential Revision: D56347734

Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.

```
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3))
```

This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute.

Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 19, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/3172

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 4431dd5 with merge base de0c233 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 19, 2024
yipjustin added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.

```
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3))
```

This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute.

Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/)

ghstack-source-id: 223244602
Pull Request resolved: #3172
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734

Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.

```
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3))
```

This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute.

Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734

Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.

```
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3))
```

This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute.

Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734

Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.

```
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3))
```

This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute.

Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in d053611.

@mergennachin mergennachin mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2024
kedarnath03 pushed a commit to kedarnath03/executorch that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/executorch#3172

Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.

```
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2))
torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3))
```

This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute.
ghstack-source-id: 223698863

Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants