-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 607
[ET-VK][8/n] Unsqueeze #3172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ET-VK][8/n] Unsqueeze #3172
Conversation
Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute. ``` torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3)) ``` This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute. Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/3172
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 4431dd5 with merge base de0c233 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute. ``` torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3)) ``` This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute. Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/) ghstack-source-id: 223244602 Pull Request resolved: #3172
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734 |
Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute. ``` torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3)) ``` This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute. Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734 |
Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute. ``` torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3)) ``` This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute. Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734 |
Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute. ``` torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3)) ``` This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute. Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56347734 |
This pull request has been merged in d053611. |
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/executorch#3172 Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute. ``` torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 0, 2, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(1)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 0, 3]) == x.unsqueeze(2)) torch.all(torch.permute(x.unsqueeze(0), [1, 2, 3, 0]) == x.unsqueeze(3)) ``` This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the `unsqueeze` operation to achieve a no-op `unsqueeze(0)` and then apply a permute. ghstack-source-id: 223698863 Differential Revision: [D56347734](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D56347734/)
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Exploit the fact that, we reduce the unsqueeze operation to permute.
This diff introduce a minor change to the Permute implementation that it no longer requires the input dimension length to match the length of the permute array. This allows the
unsqueeze
operation to achieve a no-opunsqueeze(0)
and then apply a permute.Differential Revision: D56347734