Skip to content

Conversation

pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

…elines()` to `prepare()`

Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.

## Motivation

Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.

Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`

Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)

ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorchbot pytorchbot requested a review from SS-JIA as a code owner August 19, 2025 02:24
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 19, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

  • pull / test-binary-size-linux-gcc / linux-job (gh) (trunk failure)
    /pytorch/executorch/kernels/portable/cpu/op_stack.cpp:129:26: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘size_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} and ‘ssize_t’ {aka ‘long int’} [-Werror=sign-compare]

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Aug 19, 2025
Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@SS-JIA SS-JIA merged commit 7622df0 into main Aug 19, 2025
103 of 105 checks passed
@SS-JIA SS-JIA deleted the gh/SS-JIA/293/orig branch August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit to agrima1304/executorch that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2025
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)

Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.

## Motivation

Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.

Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`

Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants