We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I wonder if we should we support Final items in a TypedDict.
Final
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This looks like a reasonable feature to me. In particular in view of the parallel obj.attr vs obj.__dict__['attr'].
obj.attr
obj.__dict__['attr']
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closing as a duplicate of #7981, which is a newer issue but has much more discussion
No branches or pull requests
I wonder if we should we support
Final
items in a TypedDict.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: