Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-32690: Preserve order of locals() #5379

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 28, 2018

Conversation

rhettinger
Copy link
Contributor

@rhettinger rhettinger commented Jan 28, 2018

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

@rhettinger The code change looks good to me, but are you sure we want to skip the NEWS entry? Otherwise folks may be puzzled as to why the behaviour is different in 3.6.4 and earlier.

@rhettinger rhettinger merged commit a4d0001 into python:master Jan 28, 2018
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

@rhettinger: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @rhettinger for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2018
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-5390 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

@rhettinger rhettinger deleted the locals-order branch January 28, 2018 17:42
rhettinger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2018
ncoghlan added a commit to ncoghlan/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2018
…ython#5390)"

This reverts commit 9105879
in order to keep the behaviour of locals() consistent between
3.6.4 and 3.6.5+.
ncoghlan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2018
This reverts commit 9105879
in order to keep the behaviour of locals() consistent between
3.6.4 and 3.6.5+.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants