Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.7] bpo-30595: Fix multiprocessing.Queue.get(timeout) #2883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2017
Merged

[2.7] bpo-30595: Fix multiprocessing.Queue.get(timeout) #2883

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2017

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Jul 26, 2017

multiprocessing.Queue.get() with a timeout now polls its reader in
non-blocking mode if it succeeded to aquire the lock but the acquire
took longer than the timeout.

Co-Authored-By: Grzegorz Grzywacz grzgrzgrz3@gmail.com
(cherry picked from commit 1b7863c)

_test_multiprocessing.test_queue_feeder_donot_stop_onexc() now uses a
timeout of 1 second on Queue.get(), instead of 0.1 second, for slow
buildbots.
(cherry picked from commit 8f6eeaf)

(cherry picked from commit e42339d)

https://bugs.python.org/issue30595

* bpo-30595: Fix multiprocessing.Queue.get(timeout) (#2027)

multiprocessing.Queue.get() with a timeout now polls its reader in
non-blocking mode if it succeeded to aquire the lock but the acquire
took longer than the timeout.

Co-Authored-By: Grzegorz Grzywacz <grzgrzgrz3@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1b7863c)

* bpo-30595: Increase test_queue_feeder_donot_stop_onexc() timeout (#2148)

_test_multiprocessing.test_queue_feeder_donot_stop_onexc() now uses a
timeout of 1 second on Queue.get(), instead of 0.1 second, for slow
buildbots.
(cherry picked from commit 8f6eeaf)

(cherry picked from commit e42339d)
@vstinner vstinner merged commit ec9a712 into python:2.7 Jul 26, 2017
@vstinner vstinner deleted the mp_queue27 branch July 26, 2017 15:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants