Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.6] bpo-30595: Fix multiprocessing.Queue.get(timeout) (#2027) #2881

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 26, 2017
Merged

[3.6] bpo-30595: Fix multiprocessing.Queue.get(timeout) (#2027) #2881

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 26, 2017

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Jul 26, 2017

vstinner added 2 commits July 26, 2017 04:46
multiprocessing.Queue.get() with a timeout now polls its reader in
non-blocking mode if it succeeded to aquire the lock but the acquire
took longer than the timeout.

Co-Authored-By: Grzegorz Grzywacz <grzgrzgrz3@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1b7863c)
_test_multiprocessing.test_queue_feeder_donot_stop_onexc() now uses a
timeout of 1 second on Queue.get(), instead of 0.1 second, for slow
buildbots.
(cherry picked from commit 8f6eeaf)
@vstinner vstinner merged commit e42339d into python:3.6 Jul 26, 2017
@vstinner vstinner deleted the mp_queue36 branch July 26, 2017 03:38
vstinner added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2017
… (#2883)

* bpo-30595: Fix multiprocessing.Queue.get(timeout) (#2027)

multiprocessing.Queue.get() with a timeout now polls its reader in
non-blocking mode if it succeeded to aquire the lock but the acquire
took longer than the timeout.

Co-Authored-By: Grzegorz Grzywacz <grzgrzgrz3@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1b7863c)

* bpo-30595: Increase test_queue_feeder_donot_stop_onexc() timeout (#2148)

_test_multiprocessing.test_queue_feeder_donot_stop_onexc() now uses a
timeout of 1 second on Queue.get(), instead of 0.1 second, for slow
buildbots.
(cherry picked from commit 8f6eeaf)

(cherry picked from commit e42339d)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants