Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.9] bpo-40791: Make compare_digest more constant-time. (GH-20444) #23436

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 21, 2020

  • bpo-40791: Make compare_digest more constant-time.

The existing volatile left/right pointers guarantee that the reads will all occur, but does not guarantee that they will be used. So a compiler can still short-circuit the loop, saving e.g. the overhead of doing the xors and especially the overhead of the data dependency between result and the reads. That would change performance depending on where the first unequal byte occurs. This change removes that optimization.

(This is change GH-1 from https://bugs.python.org/issue40791 .)
(cherry picked from commit 3172936)

Co-authored-by: Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierreda@google.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue40791

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead

* bpo-40791: Make compare_digest more constant-time.

The existing volatile `left`/`right` pointers guarantee that the reads will all occur, but does not guarantee that they will be _used_. So a compiler can still short-circuit the loop, saving e.g. the overhead of doing the xors and especially the overhead of the data dependency between `result` and the reads. That would change performance depending on where the first unequal byte occurs. This change removes that optimization.

(This is change GH-1 from https://bugs.python.org/issue40791 .)
(cherry picked from commit 3172936)

Co-authored-by: Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@google.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ssbr and @gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit c1bbca5 into python:3.9 Nov 21, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-3172936-3.9 branch November 21, 2020 09:18
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ssbr and @gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error type-security A security issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants