Skip to content

bpo-22257: Private C-API for main interpreter initialization (PEP 432). #1729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2017

Conversation

ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently commented May 22, 2017

(Patch by Nick Coghlan)

(based on #1772)

This patch introduces the bulk of the remaining changes specified by PEP 432. These are introduced here as "private" C-API while the PEP is discussed. Regardless of the status of the PEP, the changes here are an improvement to interpreter startup. As such we are making the changes now, but keeping the C-API private.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@ericsnowcurrently, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @serhiy-storchaka, @methane and @loewis to be potential reviewers.

@ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member Author

@zooba

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently force-pushed the pep432 branch 5 times, most recently from 6da8498 to 90c5a8f Compare May 23, 2017 04:43
@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently changed the title bpo-22257: Private C-API for PEP 432. bpo-22257: Private C-API for main interpreter initialization (PEP 432). May 23, 2017
@@ -28,6 +35,7 @@
#ifdef MS_WINDOWS
#undef BYTE
#include "windows.h"
/* TODO: This is duped in shutdown.c Find a way to merge them */
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Delete this

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently merged commit c7ec998 into python:master May 24, 2017
@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently deleted the pep432 branch May 24, 2017 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants