-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-119400: make_ssl_certs: update reference test data automatically, pass in expiration dates as parameters #119400 #119401
Conversation
This means CI is set up so that modifying the source tree is not possible. Suggestions? I still think it's worth making make_ssl_certs execution a part of the build, but the complication is that its output needs to be written into build dir, and both installation and tests needs to find it there. |
I've concluded that this is not feasible for now:
I'll drop that from this PR, and make it only about not hardcoding reference certificate data and expiration parameters. |
87c0672
to
be2c50f
Compare
This seems to be not getting any attention, is there something I can do to push it forward? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay; my review queue grew too long and I had to trim it.
This looks great, but let's change a few details:
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Build/2024-05-22-13-18-02.gh-issue-119400.WEt83v.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
6a43765
to
af59334
Compare
The script was simply printing the reference data and asking users to update it by hand into the test suites. This can be easily improved by writing the data into files and having the test cases load the files. Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
…mand line Note that the defaults are same as they were, so if nothing is specified, the script works exactly as before. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
af59334
to
4bff2d1
Compare
@encukou Thanks, everything should be addressed now. |
* main: (69 commits) Add "annotate" SET_FUNCTION_ATTRIBUTE bit to dis. (python#124566) pythongh-124412: Add helpers for converting annotations to source format (python#124551) pythongh-119180: Disallow instantiation of ConstEvaluator objects (python#124561) For-else deserves its own section in the tutorial (python#123946) Add 3.13 as a version option to the crash issue template (python#124560) pythongh-123242: Note that type.__annotations__ may not exist (python#124557) pythongh-119180: Make FORWARDREF format look at __annotations__ first (python#124479) pythonGH-58058: Add quick reference for `ArgumentParser` to argparse docs (pythongh-124227) pythongh-41431: Add `datetime.time.strptime()` and `datetime.date.strptime()` (python#120752) pythongh-102450: Add ISO-8601 alternative for midnight to `fromisoformat()` calls. (python#105856) pythongh-124370: Add "howto" for free-threaded Python (python#124371) pythongh-121277: Allow `.. versionadded:: next` in docs (pythonGH-121278) pythongh-119400: make_ssl_certs: update reference test data automatically, pass in expiration dates as parameters python#119400 (pythonGH-119401) pythongh-119180: Avoid going through AST and eval() when possible in annotationlib (python#124337) pythongh-124448: Update Windows builds to use Tcl/Tk 8.6.15 (pythonGH-124449) pythongh-123884 Tee of tee was not producing n independent iterators (pythongh-124490) pythongh-124378: Update test_ttk for Tcl/Tk 8.6.15 (pythonGH-124542) pythongh-124513: Check args in framelocalsproxy_new() (python#124515) pythongh-101100: Add a table of class attributes to the "Custom classes" section of the data model docs (python#124480) Doc: Use ``major.minor`` for documentation distribution archive filenames (python#124489) ...
…utomatically, pass in expiration dates as parameters python#119400 (pythonGH-119401)" This reverts commit 1ff1b89.
As discussed here:
#107594
make_ssl_certs.py has a few shortcomings. In particular:
This pull request aims to address first and last issue, so then #107594 can move forward on top of them.