GH-103906: Remove immortal refcounting in the interpreter#103909
Merged
brandtbucher merged 7 commits intopython:mainfrom May 16, 2023
Merged
GH-103906: Remove immortal refcounting in the interpreter#103909brandtbucher merged 7 commits intopython:mainfrom
brandtbucher merged 7 commits intopython:mainfrom
Conversation
brandtbucher
added
performance
hauntsaninja
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2023
Contributor
hauntsaninja
left a comment
hauntsaninja
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hooray! Looks great
sunmy2019
reviewed
Apr 27, 2023
| } | ||
| else if (Py_IsFalse(cond)) { | ||
| _Py_DECREF_NO_DEALLOC(cond); | ||
| if (Py_IsFalse(cond)) { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will this cause a performance change, since formerly IsTrue then IsFalse, now IsFalse then IsTrue
Though this comparison is lightweight.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Honestly, I doubt it.
brandtbucher
added
the
🔨 test-with-buildbots
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @brandtbucher for commit fd95518 🤖 If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again. |
bedevere-bot
removed
the
🔨 test-with-buildbots
sobolevn
reviewed
Apr 27, 2023
Member
sobolevn
left a comment
sobolevn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about other places, like Modules/? Should it be done later?
Member
|
@sobolevn possibly, but it's best left to a different PR. In many places it's unlikely to make a significant difference, so it might not be worth the churn to make the change everywhere. |
Member
Author
|
Annoyingly, perf impact is neutral. However, it appears that the results are being pulled way down by a couple of known unstable benchmarks that should be unaffected by this change. I might try running them again tonight, just to see. (I still think this is worth doing, though, as it clearly removes unnecessary work from many hot code paths.) |
markshannon
approved these changes
May 12, 2023
Member
markshannon
left a comment
markshannon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Even if the performance change is negligible, this seems like a worthwhile cleanup.
Member
|
I noticed one more opportunity like this: in the |
|
carljm
added a commit
to carljm/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
* main: (26 commits) pythonGH-101520: Move tracemalloc functionality into core, leaving interface in Modules. (python#104508) typing: Add more tests for TypeVar (python#104571) pythongh-104572: Improve error messages for invalid constructs in PEP 695 contexts (python#104573) typing: Use PEP 695 syntax in typing.py (python#104553) pythongh-102153: Start stripping C0 control and space chars in `urlsplit` (python#102508) pythongh-104469: Update README.txt for _testcapi (pythongh-104529) pythonGH-103092: isolate `_elementtree` (python#104561) pythongh-104050: Add typing to Argument Clinic converters (python#104547) pythonGH-103906: Remove immortal refcounting in the interpreter (pythonGH-103909) pythongh-87474: Fix file descriptor leaks in subprocess.Popen (python#96351) pythonGH-103092: isolate `pyexpat` (python#104506) pythongh-75367: Fix data descriptor detection in inspect.getattr_static (python#104517) pythongh-104050: Add more annotations to `Tools/clinic.py` (python#104544) pythongh-104555: Fix isinstance() and issubclass() for runtime-checkable protocols that use PEP 695 (python#104556) pythongh-103865: add monitoring support to LOAD_SUPER_ATTR (python#103866) CODEOWNERS: Assign new PEP 695 files to myself (python#104551) pythonGH-104510: Fix refleaks in `_io` base types (python#104516) pythongh-104539: Fix indentation error in logging.config.rst (python#104545) pythongh-104050: Don't star-import 'types' in Argument Clinic (python#104543) pythongh-104050: Add basic typing to CConverter in clinic.py (python#104538) ...
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.