You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Python 3.9.14: grammar/clarity improvements for str.encode, str.decode error-checking documentation #99991
The are a couple of paragraphs about error-checking behaviour for str.encode and str.decode that appears in a few versions of Python and could potentially be improved in future versions.
By default, the errors argument is not checked for best performances, but only used at the first encoding error. Enable the Python Development Mode, or use a debug build to check errors.
The paragraph before that is fairly dense - there could be an opportunity to improve both of them.
It's not easy, but I'll try - here's an attempt for str.encode:
str.encode(encoding="utf-8", errors="strict")
Return a bytes object containing the string in the requested encoding.
The default strict error handling raises a UnicodeError exception when an encoding error occurs. Other possible values include ignore, replace, xmlcharrefreplace, backslashreplace and any other name registered via codecs.register_error(), see section Error Handlers.
For performance reasons, the value of the errors argument is not checked for validity unless Python Development Mode is enabled.
Process used
Thinking like refactoring, the important items to maintain (like creating unit tests) seemed to be:
That the documentation describes what the method does (encodes a string, handles errors)
That relevant entities are hyperlinked/emphasized
That the documentation is relatively concise (the time required to read and understand the description is similar or reduced)
So looking at the text, there seemed to be a few steps to refactor it:
Break the dense paragraph into individual statements (usually individual sentences)
Apply consistent emphasis to entities (types, arguments, ...) that appear in the statements
Remove redundant/self-explanatory statements
It's a 2-argument method -- and each argument requires explanation -- so consolidate the statements into one paragraph per argument:
Move sentences describing encoding into the first paragraph
Move sentences describing errors into the second paragraph
Exception: some of the commentary appears to be about non-functional behaviour (performance) -- OK, that could move into a third paragraph
Re-read and refactor to remove unnecessary words and statements
Nitpick: error handling is important to understand, so let's move the list of codecs -- useful though it is -- to after the errors argument, in the hope that people will read about error-handling first
For performance reasons, the value of the errors argument is not checked for validity unless Python Development Mode is enabled.
Ah: I forgot to mention debug builds in this suggestion. Similar to development-mode, debug builds also validate the errors argument.
A simple check to test whether error-handler-name-validation is enabled is to attempt encoding using an invalid error-handler-name. For example, "".encode('utf-8', errors='gh-99991').
By the way, thanks for your comprehensive and insightful feedback, @jayaddison ! We'd love to have more of it elsewhere, and you're welcome to contribute the changes yourself if you like—you seem to have quite a knack for documentation writing, which makes a big positive impact on the community. Thanks again!
Thanks for the kind words @CAM-Gerlach! There are more than a few similarities between good code and good documentation, I think 😄 I'll do my best to help out where and when I can.
Activity
bizzyvinci commentedon Dec 9, 2022
do you have recommendations on how to improve them
jayaddison commentedon Dec 9, 2022
It's not easy, but I'll try - here's an attempt for
str.encode:Process used
Thinking like refactoring, the important items to maintain (like creating unit tests) seemed to be:
So looking at the text, there seemed to be a few steps to refactor it:
encodinginto the first paragrapherrorsinto the second paragraphNote:
errorsargumentbizzyvinci commentedon Dec 9, 2022
Thanks. I'll work on that.
jayaddison commentedon Dec 10, 2022
Ah: I forgot to mention debug builds in this suggestion. Similar to development-mode, debug builds also validate the errors argument.
A simple check to test whether error-handler-name-validation is enabled is to attempt encoding using an invalid error-handler-name. For example,
"".encode('utf-8', errors='gh-99991').CAM-Gerlach commentedon Dec 16, 2022
By the way, thanks for your comprehensive and insightful feedback, @jayaddison ! We'd love to have more of it elsewhere, and you're welcome to contribute the changes yourself if you like—you seem to have quite a knack for documentation writing, which makes a big positive impact on the community. Thanks again!
jayaddison commentedon Dec 16, 2022
Thanks for the kind words @CAM-Gerlach! There are more than a few similarities between good code and good documentation, I think 😄 I'll do my best to help out where and when I can.
gh-99991: improve docs on str.encode and bytes.decode (#100198)
pythongh-99991: improve docs on str.encode and bytes.decode (pythonGH…
pythongh-99991: improve docs on str.encode and bytes.decode (pythonGH…
gh-99991: improve docs on str.encode and bytes.decode (GH-100198)
gh-99991: improve docs on str.encode and bytes.decode (GH-100198)
hauntsaninja commentedon Dec 21, 2022
Thanks, looks like everything is merged!
Merged main into regmachine branch (#50)