-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No need to specify mock
#702
Conversation
209d1a0
to
f9f1132
Compare
|
f9f1132
to
b4857cf
Compare
4b4549f
to
31bb1b8
Compare
Thanks @a-ungurianu, I threw this PR up quickly from web UI and then completely forgot about it! |
Seeing a weird error in #702 and wondering if it's because latest `mock` is actually `5.0.1`: https://mock.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html so threw this up to see what CI thinks
6d53733
to
d2e0aaf
Compare
Codecov ReportBase: 94.63% // Head: 94.71% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #702 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.63% 94.71% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 57 57
Lines 8339 8332 -7
==========================================
Hits 7892 7892
+ Misses 447 440 -7
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
d2e0aaf
to
7aed10f
Compare
This is ready for review. The miniscule drop in coverage is a side effect of changing imports and shouldn't block merging. |
It's now part of the Python stdlib since `3.3`. So no need to specify it.
7aed10f
to
064fed0
Compare
Can I please get a review on this so we can land it before merge conflicts creep in? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
It's now part of the Python stdlib since
3.3
.So no need to specify it.