Pdbcls without pdb on fail#1952
Conversation
|
The patch looks good to me, although it should go into About your test, what is the error you are getting? Also, I don't see the connection between the |
|
ah yes, the content of the |
|
ok, think i got it working |
|
@nicoddemus is "it should go into |
|
@davidszotten you need to click edit next to the PR title which will give you a drop down list where you can choose between master and features. After changing to features you'll probably have to fix merge-conflicts for the changelog file and then it should be good to go |
|
ah, "be raised against the |
4732b26 to
d75748e
Compare
Also created "New Features" and "Changes" sections.
fixes #1948
i tried to add a final test for using
pdb.set_trace(), but couldn't get it to work. any advice appreciated