A small, simple kernel of PyScript, made for testing purposes.
This is the way:
- Obvious code.
- Simple is good.
- No dependencies.
- Vanilla JavaScript.
- Pluggable.
- Comments.
- Tests.
- Build for change.
This is a solid foundation for lightweight testing of Python runtimes that target WASM. Inspired by code in the "real" PyTest website and our plans for plugins and simple event based coordination.
Complexity, edge cases and customization is (hopefully) confined to plugins and bespoke runtimes.
That is all.
In order to compile MicroPython you'll need to ensure you have the expected dev tools described here:
https://docs.micropython.org/en/latest/develop/gettingstarted.html
Otherwise, common tasks are scripted by a Makefile (tested on Linux):
$ make
There's no default Makefile target right now. Try:
make setup - clone the required repositories.
make update - update the emsdk compiler.
make mp - compile MicroPython for WASM into the mpbuild directory.
make serve - serve the project at: http://0.0.0.0:8000/
make test - while serving the app, run the test suite in browser.
To get a working development environment with MicroPython run:
$ make setup
$ make update
$ make mp
To check things are working:
$ make serve
Then point your browser to http://0.0.0.0:8000/ to see a "Hello World" from MicroPython.
- Makefile - common tasks scripted into convenient targets. See above.
- hello.py - a simple "hello world" Python script for PyScript to run.
- index.html - a small web page that uses PyScript.
- pyscript.js - the simple, single file implementation of PyScript.
To change the configuration of PyScript take a look at the JSON object
defined in the <py-config>
tag in index.html
. Currently valid runtimes are
micropython
or pyodide
.
For the sake of simplicity (and familiarity) we use the Jasmine test framework to exercise the JavaScript aspects of our code.
Ensure the project is being served (make serve
) and in a different shell, in
the root of this project, type make test
. Your default browser should open
and run the Jasmine based test suite.
There are copious comments in the pyscript.js
file. My intention is for
simplicity, lack of onerous dependencies (bye-bye npm
), and
understandability. This code is working if it's easy to understand what's going
on. To this end, it's laid out in a "literate" manner, so the code "tells the
story" of this implementation of PyScript by reading it from top to bottom.
In terms of architecture, this version of PyScript aims to provide a very
small core that coordinates features and capabilities provided by plugins. This
coordination is almost always handled by dispatching custom events to the
document
. Everything is losely coupled, and state is contained within the
function/closure that is the main
function (called right at the end). The
main
function returns an object containing methods to interact with
PyScript (useful for testing purposes).
The Plugin
class is based upon Antonio's suggestion
found here,
and should be relatively self explanatory.
The only difference between this implementation and Antonio's is that his
version has before_evalute
and after_evaluate
methods. These are redundant
in this version of PyScript since it's not known ahead of time when either the
scripts nor runtime will be ready for evaluation. As far as I can tell, I think
these functions are supposed to be run either before or after ALL the scripts
are evaluated (at once) rather than before or after each individual script.
This probably needs more thought/discussion.
The Runtime
class abstracts away all the implementation details of the
various Python runtimes we might use. To see a complete implementation see the
MicroPythonRuntime
class that inherits from Runtime
. There is also an
incomplete PyodideRuntime
class so I was able to compare and contrast the
differences between implementations and arrive at a general abstraction (still
very much a work in progress). Again, the comments in the code should explain
what's going on in terms of the life-cycle and capabilities of a "runtime".
Finally, the defaultSplash
is the innerHtml
added to / removed from the DOM
to indicate PyScript is starting up. It currently overlays an opaque DIV with
the centred words "Loading PyScript...". This can be overridden by adding a
splash
entry to the JSON configuration in the <py-config>
tag.
Currently, only one plugin is currently defined to handle the <py-script>
tag: PyScriptTag
. This is a rather simple plugin which ultimately dispatches
the py-script-registered
custom event (containing relevant metadata) to
indicate Python source code has been found in the page (more on this later).
The afore mentioned MicroPythonRuntime
, CPythonRuntime
and PyodideRuntime
all, to a greater or lesser extent, define a uniform shim around their
respective runtimes. The MicroPython one is most complete, but still needs work
as I make changes to how MicroPython itself exposes stdout
, stderr
and
consumes stdin
.
This is simply a main
function / closure, in which is stored lots of private
state and definitions that we don't want bleeding out into the
external-to-PyScript context.
The function starts with a definition of a very simple logger that pre-pends
"🐍" to all PyScript related console.log
messages, for ease of reading.
Next comes some declarations and initial states for various objects used to store state and coordinate the activity of PyScript. Because they only exist within the context of the closure, they're effectively private to the outside world. The comments and their names should indicate their function and how they relate to each other.
Next comes the definition of an app
object. This is what is eventually
returned by the main
function (for testing purposes). The object contains
various functions that manage the state and coordinate the activity of
PyScript. Again, the function names and their associated commentary should
describe what the intention is for each one. To be honest, they're all really
very serious, with the most complicated being due to conditional paths
depending on the state of the runtime.
As each function finishes its task, if required, it signals a change in state
through dispatching custom events via the document
object.
Underneath the app
object are defined some event handler functions that
"plumb together" the various capabilities defined in the app
's functions. How
these relate to each other is described below.
Finally, depending on a window.pyscriptTest
flag (set to true
in a testing
context), the event handlers are registered against the relevant events and
the loadConfig
function is called to boot up the whole thing.
The story of the PyScript app, roughly unfolds like this:
- The
main
function is called, with the resultingapp
object bound towindow.pyscriptApp
. - Calling
main
also causes PyScript to load any user configuration (currently, for simplicity's sake, expressed as JSON). When this is finished thepy-configured
event is fired. - Next, built-in plugins are registered, after which the (internal)
config
object is frozen (i.e. can't change). - The default
<py-script>
tag dispatches apy-script-registered
event when a Python script is found. - If the Python script's code is inline (i.e. a part of the document already)
then a
py-script-loaded
event is dispatched for that script. However, if the Python script is referenced via asrc
URL, then PyScript fetches the remote asset and only dispatchespy-script-loaded
for the script when the code is retrieved. - If the runtime is ready, each newly registered script is immediately
evaluated by dispatching the
py-eval-script
. Otherwise, the scripts are added to apendingScripts
array for later processing when the runtime has finally started. - In the meantime, the runtime specified in the
config
is loaded into the browser by injecting ascript
tag into thehead
of the document. When this script has finished loading apy-runtime-loaded
event is dispatched. - The
Runtime
subclass instance, representing the loaded runtime, then has itsstart
method called. Upon completion of starting up the runtime, thepy-runtime-ready
event is dispatched and theruntimeReady
flag is set to true. - At this point, any scripts in the
pendingScripts
array are evaluated in order, after which the array is cleared and discarded.
That's it. You can see this unfolding in the image below, taken from the
console logs for the example hello.py
based application found in
index.html
.
Who knows..? But this is a good scaffold for testing different Python runtimes.
Next steps:
- More comprehensive tests.
CPythonRuntime
fully implemented.PyodideRuntime
finished.MicroPythonRuntime
refactored after making MicroPython play nicer withstdout
andstderr
.- A plugin for a
<py-repl>
tag (the foundations are in place). - A uniform way to
pip install
packages in each runtime. - A uniform JavaScript gateway from within each runtime.
- A uniform
navigator
object through which to access the DOM from within each runtime. - Running in web-workers (and associated message passing work), for each runtime.
That's it..! ;-)