Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make Sphinx usage example clearer #973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2023

Conversation

matt-graham
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #972

Follows previous version at runtime usage example in using "package-name" as placeholder argument to importlib.metadata.version rather than 'setuptools_scm' to make it clearer that this needs to be changed to relevant package name.

Copy link
Contributor

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 👍

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt merged commit 26d5d43 into pypa:main Nov 10, 2023
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation for Sphinx usage a bit unclear
2 participants