Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Short for --process-dependency-links #5112

Closed
carlosdanielcsantos opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Short for --process-dependency-links #5112

carlosdanielcsantos opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
auto-locked Outdated issues that have been locked by automation state: blocked Can not be done until something else is done type: enhancement Improvements to functionality

Comments

@carlosdanielcsantos
Copy link

Description:

I believe the option --process-dependency-links is widely used by users who develop libraries. I use it almost every day and often many times per day and it becomes really annoying to type that long, error-prone, sentence every time.

I know it's deprecated but there are many use cases (#4187) like developing private libraries without a pypi server. A short alternative for --process-dependency-links would be handy.

@davilima6
Copy link

Although I agree a shorthand would be convenient it seems best to wait/work for the option to stabilise (there's still a deprecation warning) before expanding it. In the meanwhile users can install pip completions to mitigate typos (or use shell scripts/alias/functions).

@pradyunsg pradyunsg added the state: blocked Can not be done until something else is done label Apr 7, 2018
@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member

I'm gonna say this is blocked by #4187. Until we reach a resolution for that, I don't think this shorthand is gonna happen.

@pradyunsg pradyunsg added the type: enhancement Improvements to functionality label Apr 7, 2018
@xavfernandez
Copy link
Member

With #5726 merged and --process-dependency-links really going away, this is now very unlikely to happen: I'm closing this.
Thanks for the suggestion though.

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 1, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot added the auto-locked Outdated issues that have been locked by automation label Jun 1, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 1, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
auto-locked Outdated issues that have been locked by automation state: blocked Can not be done until something else is done type: enhancement Improvements to functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants