Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add pysqa command which raises an exception #465

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Oct 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced enhanced command execution capabilities with improved error handling through a new function.
    • Updated the queuing system to utilize the new command execution logic.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error management by ensuring unsupported keys are removed before job submission.
  • Tests

    • Added a comprehensive test suite for the new command execution function, including tests for successful execution and error handling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new function _pysqa_execute_command in the executorlib/standalone/cache/queue.py file, which improves error handling for command execution using subprocess.check_output. The existing execute_with_pysqa function is modified to use this new command execution function. A new test suite is added in tests/test_pysqa_subprocess.py to validate the functionality and error handling of _pysqa_execute_command, including tests for both successful and failed command executions.

Changes

File Change Summary
executorlib/standalone/cache/queue.py - Added _pysqa_execute_command function for enhanced command execution and error handling.
- Modified execute_with_pysqa to include execute_command=_pysqa_execute_command.
- Updated import statements and adjusted type hints.
tests/test_pysqa_subprocess.py - Introduced TestPysqaExecuteCommand class with tests for _pysqa_execute_command, covering successful command execution and error handling.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add additional tests to improve coverage #464: The new test method test_execute_in_subprocess_errors in this PR focuses on error handling in subprocess execution, which is relevant to the error management enhancements introduced by the _pysqa_execute_command function in the main PR.

Poem

In the queue where commands play,
A rabbit hops, brightening the day.
With subprocess magic, errors no more,
We execute tasks, and the troubles soar!
A test suite added, to catch every fall,
Hopping along, we conquer it all! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit c65100b into main Oct 29, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the pysqa_command branch October 29, 2024 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant