Confusing types for callbacks #5493
TonyCongqianWang
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
After thinking about it for a while I got it working as I want, though it is not pretty. I changed all pointers in my signature to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I tried to use a python function as callback and could not get it to work. After some testing I got very confused:
The signature I tested was
const std::function<void(double[])>
as I wanted to use a numba cfunc as a callback to modify values in my array. I was very confused, that the value of the first array member was passed instead. After digging around in the issues I found out that this was intended behaviour. Appearentlyconst std::function<void(double*)>
means that the value gets passed as a reference. This was not intuitive to me at all and I couldn't find the documentation of this behaviour.Is there any way to actually modify an array? As I want to fill an large Array with values , I want to avoid using callbacks returning a single double. In some issues I found usage of struct types or std::vectors, but I am unsure on how to transfer this to my use case.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions