return_value_policy::take_ownership for nested pointers

[marcingretl]

Hi,
let's assume that function returns py::dict* with return_value_policy::take_ownership set explicitly (let's call in dictionary A). Now let's assume that under a key "B" A contains a pointer to another dictionary, i.e. py::dict *.

Question: will both pointers be deleted on python exit, or just A (an external) and B will cause a memory leak?