Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we adapt the expected wording to the changes in Optional N4078 #22

Open
viboes opened this issue Jul 12, 2014 · 0 comments
Open
Labels

Comments

@viboes
Copy link
Collaborator

viboes commented Jul 12, 2014

N4078 - Fixes for optional objects http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4078.html contains some fixes to Optional that can be adapted to Expected.

Should we take care of them?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant