Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tag alpine container images of given version #13738

Closed
nicolasochem opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Tag alpine container images of given version #13738

nicolasochem opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@nicolasochem
Copy link

Thank you for adding a container with shell included in #13487

However, this container is only tagged with latest-alpine.

Can we have tags such as v5.0.1-alpine as well please? Otherwise we can't pick a specific version.

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

Hi, we no longer support alpine images. #12749

Please use latest or stable or v5.0.1 tags

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 13, 2024
@nicolasochem
Copy link
Author

But your most recent images have no shell in them.

I was using the images from EF devops but they also stop building them. ethpandaops/eth-client-docker-image-builder#111 (comment)

Who do I talk to to get prysm container images with a shell included? This is essential for debugability. Thanks

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

@nicolasochem EF devops stopped building those since we started including /bin/bash. I hear you that /bin/sh is not available. Could you modify your commands to use bash instead?

@nicolasochem
Copy link
Author

Thanks. It's something unexpected with k9s utility. I am always able to type s and shell into a container. This doesn't work with prysm, but kubectl exec -it prysm-val-0 -n eth-val-holesky-bm /bin/bash works. It's unclear what it would be the case, but at least we have a workaround with kubectl.

I thought k9s would always try bash first, and then fall back to sh if bash is not available, but it looks like it's not the case here.

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

prestonvanloon commented Mar 13, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants