Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SDD for Commodore Compile Pipeline #181
Add SDD for Commodore Compile Pipeline #181
Changes from 4 commits
af8da0b
736e4d4
d337890
fe9f02f
1a45141
ac3caef
c0b0906
b376990
b8c3a3c
2a4eb2e
178836d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to move this to
status.compilePipeline
now that it's intended to be fully operator-managed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we're going back to having the
pipelineFiles
, it doesn't make sense to fully move this into status anymore. But we might want to split it into configurable vs. operator managed fields and only put the latter in status. I'm not sure what's better practice - keep them together, or have a strict split between managed and user-defined?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure what the best practice is here, maybe @bastjan can chime in?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer fully operator managed fields in
.status
it removes a source of misunderstandings. Not a super firm position since Kubernetes also fully manages a lot of fields in.spec
in the core manifests.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've split it up now. This prompted me to also add an
enabled
field in the spec.