You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2022. It is now read-only.
Instant messengers currently lists under Voice/Video Calling only the softwares that allows for group calling. This gives a false sense to the lambda user that only these softwares can be used for voice/video calls.
However, the instant messengers section includes a mix of softwares allowing for voice calls (Signal, Element) and others which only supports textual messages (Briar, maybe soon Session).
Nevertheless, 1-on-1 encrypted voice calls is a pretty common use case. Hence, I'd suggest to:
Rename "Voice/Video Calling" to "Group Voice/Video Calling", to emphasize that it is primarily intended for group/work use cases.
Either create a new section "Personal Voice/Video Calling" or ensure that each software in Encrypted Instant Messengers describe if they support encrypted 1-on-1 voice call, video call or only textual messages. The advantage with the latter is that we would keep the centralized/decentralized/distributed-or-peer-to-peer typology.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Instant messengers currently lists under Voice/Video Calling only the softwares that allows for group calling. This gives a false sense to the lambda user that only these softwares can be used for voice/video calls.
However, the instant messengers section includes a mix of softwares allowing for voice calls (Signal, Element) and others which only supports textual messages (Briar, maybe soon Session).
Nevertheless, 1-on-1 encrypted voice calls is a pretty common use case. Hence, I'd suggest to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: