Skip to content

chore: folder structure changes #40

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

DominicGBauer
Copy link
Contributor

@DominicGBauer DominicGBauer commented Apr 15, 2024

Description

The web-sdk alpha release branch is getting really out of sync with main, getting the change in folder structure in will reduce the overhead of changes made that are independent of anything related to web.

Work Done

  • Included folder structure changes found in alpha-release branch

How to test

  • Review any recent changes and confirm they are included in this

@stevensJourney
Copy link
Contributor

As the person who made the initial folder structure changes I am happy with these changes 😁 , that being said I would defer the final approval to @rkistner in order to have a different set of eyes on it.

It's not listed in the PR description, but I'm assuming the alpha-release branch has been updated with master before these changes were extracted from it? This PR only contains 2 commits, which makes it difficult to verify it's up to date without going through the code line-by-line.

@DominicGBauer
Copy link
Contributor Author

DominicGBauer commented Apr 16, 2024

@stevensJourney I have not updated alpha-release branch yet as I wanted to do this in steps to avoid overwriting things unintentionally. I collated the changes though between the master and alpha-release branches by seeing going through the diff and so all of Ralf's changes should be in here with the folder structure changes you made in alpha-release.

Copy link
Contributor

@rkistner rkistner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm happy with the changes here.

Just note that some of these are breaking changes, for example DefaultSqliteOpenFactory.open() changing to return a future, so any future release will have to bump the version to at least 0.7.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants