Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisar necessidade do atributo subjects #88

Open
rodfersou opened this issue May 24, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #100
Open

Revisar necessidade do atributo subjects #88

rodfersou opened this issue May 24, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #100

Comments

@rodfersou
Copy link
Member

Foi levantado que esse atributo pode ser substituido pelo behavior padrão do Plone:

https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/blob/master/plone/app/dexterity/behaviors/metadata.py#L104-L114

@rodfersou
Copy link
Member Author

@hvelarde ^

@idgserpro
Copy link
Member

Para a branch 1.x, iremos fazer o fix proposto em #85 que ainda conta com essa estrutura. Mas sim, no 2.x pode ser pensado essa troca do behavior com o devido upgradeStep.

@hvelarde
Copy link
Member

de acordo com https://listas.interlegis.gov.br/pipermail/plonegov-br/2018-June/004767.html o campo é desnecessário e pode ser removido.

@idgserpro
Copy link
Member

Reabrindo porque o campo subjects ainda não foi substituído pelo behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants