Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expression: implement vectorized evaluation for builtinAtan1ArgSig #12227

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 17, 2019

Conversation

jacklightChen
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

implement vectorized evaluation for builtinAsinSig, for #12105

What is changed and how it works?

according to benchmark, about 4 times faster than before:

BenchmarkVectorizedBuiltinMathFunc/builtinAtan1ArgSig-VecBuiltinFunc-8            200000             10782 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkVectorizedBuiltinMathFunc/builtinAtan1ArgSig-NonVecBuiltinFunc-8          50000             26905 ns/op            0 B/op          0 allocs/op

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

@sre-bot sre-bot added the contribution This PR is from a community contributor. label Sep 17, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #12227 into master will decrease coverage by 0.0934%.
The diff coverage is 63.6363%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             master    #12227        +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage   81.1815%   81.088%   -0.0935%     
===============================================
  Files           454       454                
  Lines         98770     98451       -319     
===============================================
- Hits          80183     79832       -351     
- Misses        12829     12855        +26     
- Partials       5758      5764         +6

Copy link
Member

@zz-jason zz-jason left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zz-jason zz-jason added component/expression status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 17, 2019
@zz-jason zz-jason requested a review from qw4990 September 17, 2019 11:31
Reminiscent
Reminiscent previously approved these changes Sep 17, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@Reminiscent Reminiscent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Reminiscent Reminiscent added status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 17, 2019
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 17, 2019

/run-all-tests

@Reminiscent Reminiscent removed the request for review from qw4990 September 17, 2019 12:23
@Reminiscent
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

zz-jason
zz-jason previously approved these changes Sep 17, 2019
@jacklightChen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@zz-jason
Copy link
Member

/merge

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 17, 2019

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot sre-bot merged commit 72c1dbc into pingcap:master Sep 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/expression contribution This PR is from a community contributor. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants