title | summary | aliases | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQL Plan Management (SPM) |
Learn about SQL Plan Management in TiDB. |
|
SQL Plan Management is a set of functions that execute SQL bindings to manually interfere with SQL execution plans. These functions include SQL binding, baseline capturing, and baseline evolution.
An SQL binding is the basis of SPM. The Optimizer Hints document introduces how to select a specific execution plan using hints. However, sometimes you need to interfere with execution selection without modifying SQL statements. With SQL bindings, you can select a specified execution plan without modifying SQL statements.
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
CREATE [GLOBAL | SESSION] BINDING FOR SelectStmt USING SelectStmt
This statement binds SQL execution plans at the GLOBAL or SESSION level. The default scope is SESSION. The bound SQL statement is parameterized and stored in the system table. When a SQL query is processed, as long as the parameterized SQL statement and a bound one in the system table are consistent and the system variable tidb_use_plan_baselines
is set to on
(the default value is on
), the corresponding optimizer hint is available. If multiple execution plans are available, the optimizer chooses to bind the plan with the least cost.
When a SQL statement has bound execution plans in both GLOBAL and SESSION scopes, because the optimizer ignores the bound execution plan in the GLOBAL scope when it encounters the SESSION binding, the bound execution plan of this statement in the SESSION scope shields the execution plan in the GLOBAL scope.
For example:
-- Creates a GLOBAL binding and specifies using `sort merge join` in this binding.
create global binding for
select * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id
using
select /*+ sm_join(t1, t2) */ * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id;
-- The execution plan of this SQL statement uses the `sort merge join` specified in the GLOBAL binding.
explain select * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id;
-- Creates another SESSION binding and specifies using `hash join` in this binding.
create binding for
select * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id
using
select /*+ hash_join(t1, t2) */ * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id;
-- In the execution plan of this statement, `hash join` specified in the SESSION binding is used, instead of `sort merge join` specified in the GLOBAL binding.
explain select * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id;
When the first select
statement is being executed, the optimizer adds the sm_join(t1, t2)
hint to the statement through the binding in the GLOBAL scope. The top node of the execution plan in the explain
result is MergeJoin. When the second select
statement is being executed, the optimizer uses the binding in the SESSION scope instead of the binding in the GLOBAL scope and adds the hash_join(t1, t2)
hint to the statement. The top node of the execution plan in the explain
result is HashJoin.
Parameterization
is a process that converts a constant in an SQL statement to a variable parameter, with standardized processing on the spaces and line breaks in the SQL statement, for example,
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
select * from t where a > 1
-- parameterized:
select * from t where a > ?
Each standardized SQL statement can have only one binding created using CREATE BINDING
at a time. When multiple bindings are created for the same standardized SQL statement, the last created binding is retained, and all previous bindings (created and evolved) are marked as deleted. But session bindings and global bindings can coexist and are not affected by this logic.
In addition, when you create a binding, TiDB requires that the session is in a database context, which means that a database is specified when the client is connected or use ${database}
is executed.
Note:
The text must be the same before and after parameterization and hint removal for both the original SQL statement and the bound statement, or the binding will fail. Take the following examples:
This binding can be created successfully because the texts before and after parameterization and hint removal are the same:
select * from t where a > ?
CREATE BINDING FOR SELECT * FROM t WHERE a > 1 USING SELECT * FROM t use index (idx) WHERE a > 2This binding will fail because the original SQL statement is processed as
select * from t where a > ?
, while the bound SQL statement is processed differently asselect * from t where b > ?
.CREATE BINDING FOR SELECT * FROM t WHERE a > 1 USING SELECT * FROM t use index(idx) WHERE b > 2
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
DROP [GLOBAL | SESSION] BINDING FOR SelectStmt
This statement removes a specified execution plan binding at the GLOBAL or SESSION level. The default scope is SESSION.
Generally, the binding in the SESSION scope is mainly used for test or in special situations. For a binding to take effect in all TiDB processes, you need to use the GLOBAL binding. A created SESSION binding shields the corresponding GLOBAL binding until the end of the SESSION, even if the SESSION binding is dropped before the session closes. In this case, no binding takes effect and the plan is selected by the optimizer.
The following example is based on the example in create binding in which the SESSION binding shields the GLOBAL binding:
-- Drops the binding created in the SESSION scope.
drop session binding for select * from t1, t2 where t1.id = t2.id;
-- Views the SQL execution plan again.
explain select * from t1,t2 where t1.id = t2.id;
In the example above, the dropped binding in the SESSION scope shields the corresponding binding in the GLOBAL scope. The optimizer does not add the sm_join(t1, t2)
hint to the statement. The top node of the execution plan in the explain
result is not fixed to MergeJoin by this hint. Instead, the top node is independently selected by the optimizer according to the cost estimation.
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
SHOW [GLOBAL | SESSION] BINDINGS [ShowLikeOrWhere]
This statement outputs the execution plan bindings at the GLOBAL or SESSION level. The default scope is SESSION. Currently SHOW BINDINGS
outputs eight columns, as shown below:
Column Name | Note |
---|---|
original_sql | Original SQL statement after parameterization |
bind_sql | Bound SQL statement with hints |
default_db | Default database |
status | Status including Using, Deleted, Invalid, Rejected, and Pending verification |
create_time | Creating time |
update_time | Updating time |
charset | Character set |
collation | Ordering rule |
source | The way in which a binding is created, including manual (created by the create [global] binding SQL statement), capture (captured automatically by TiDB), and evolve (evolved automatically by TiDB) |
To enable baseline capturing, set tidb_capture_plan_baselines
to on
. The default value is off
.
Note:
Because the automatic binding creation function relies on Statement Summary, make sure to enable Statement Summary before using automatic binding.
After automatic binding creation is enabled, the historical SQL statements in the Statement Summary are traversed every bind-info-lease
(the default value is 3s
), and baseline capturing is automatically created for SQL statements that appear at least twice.
Note:
Because TiDB has some embedded SQL statements to ensure the correctness of some features, baseline capturing by default automatically shields these SQL statements.
Baseline evolution is an important feature of SPM introduced in TiDB v4.0.0-rc.
As data updates, the previously bound execution plan might no longer be optimal. The baseline evolution feature can automatically optimize the bound execution plan.
In addition, baseline evolution, to a certain extent, can also avoid the jitter brought to the execution plan caused by the change of statistical information.
Use the following statement to enable automatic binding evolution:
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
set global tidb_evolve_plan_baselines = on;
The default value of tidb_evolve_plan_baselines
is off
.
Note:
The global variable does not take effect in the current session. It only takes effect in a newly created session. To enable automatic binding evolution in the current session, change the keyword
global
tosession
.
After the automatic binding evolution feature is enabled, if the optimal execution plan selected by the optimizer is not among the binding execution plans, the optimizer marks the plan as an execution plan that waits for verification. At every bind-info-lease
(the default value is 3s
) interval, an execution plan to be verified is selected and compared with the binding execution plan that has the least cost in terms of the actual execution time. If the plan to be verified has shorter execution time, this plan is marked as a usable binding. The following example describes the process above.
Assume that table t
is defined as follows:
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
create table t(a int, b int, key(a), key(b));
Perform the following query on table t
:
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
select * from t where a < 100 and b < 100;
In the table defined above, few rows meet the a < 100
condition. But for some reason, the optimizer mistakenly selects the full table scan instead of the optimal execution plan that uses index a
. You can first use the following statement to create a binding:
{{< copyable "sql" >}}
create global binding for select * from t where a < 100 and b < 100 using select * from t use index(a) where a < 100 and b < 100;
When the query above is executed again, the optimizer selects index a
(influenced by the binding created above) to reduce the query time.
Assuming that as insertions and deletions are performed on table t
, an increasing number of rows meet the a < 100
condition and a decreasing number of rows meet the b < 100
condition. At this time, using index a
under the binding might no longer be the optimal plan.
The binding evolution can address this kind of issues. When the optimizer recognizes data change in a table, it generates an execution plan for the query that uses index b
. However, because the binding of the current plan exists, this query plan is not adopted and executed. Instead, this plan is stored in the backend evolution list. During the evolution process, if this plan is verified to have an obviously shorter execution time than that of the current execution plan that uses index a
, index b
is added into the available binding list. After this, when the query is executed again, the optimizer first generates the execution plan that uses index b
and makes sure that this plan is in the binding list. Then the optimizer adopts and executes this plan to reduce the query time after data changes.
To reduce the impact that the automatic evolution has on clusters, use the following configurations:
- Set
tidb_evolve_plan_task_max_time
to limit the maximum execution time of each execution plan. The default value is600s
. - Set
tidb_evolve_plan_task_start_time
(00:00 +0000
by default) andtidb_evolve_plan_task_end_time
(23:59 +0000
by default) to limit the time window.
Because the baseline evolution automatically creates a new binding, when the query environment changes, the automatically created binding might have multiple behavior choices. Pay attention to the following notes:
-
Baseline evolution only evolves standardized SQL statements that have at least one global binding.
-
Because creating a new binding deletes all previous bindings (for a standardized SQL statement), the automatically evolved binding will be deleted after manually creating a new binding.
-
All hints related to the calculation process are retained during the evolution. These hints are as follows:
Hint Description memory_quota
The maximum memory that can be used for a query. use_toja
Whether the optimizer transforms sub-queries to Join. use_cascades
Whether to use the cascades optimizer. no_index_merge
Whether the optimizer uses Index Merge as an option for reading tables. read_consistent_replica
Whether to forcibly enable Follower Read when reading tables. max_execution_time
The longest duration for a query. -
read_from_storage
is a special hint in that it specifies whether to read data from TiKV or from TiFlash when reading tables. Because TiDB provides isolation reads, when the isolation condition changes, this hint has a great influence on the evolved execution plan. Therefore, when this hint exists in the initially created binding, TiDB ignores all its evolved bindings.