Implement a simple e2e test for PFP. #2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
On most operating systems, the x16 and x17 registers are not special, so there is no benefit, and only a code size cost, to constraining AUT to only using them. Therefore, adjust the backend to only use the AUT pseudo (renamed AUTx16x17 for clarity) on Darwin platforms, or if traps are requested. All other platforms use the unconstrained variant of the instruction for selection. Pull Request: llvm#132857
…ersion check. The existing version check can lead to test failures on some distribution packages of gdb where not all components of the version number are integers, such as Fedora where gdb.VERSION can be something like "15.2-4.fc41". Fix it by replacing the version check with a feature check. Pull Request: llvm#132291
This is so that we'll be able to use it in compiler-rt as well. Dependencies on LLVM Support were removed from the header by restoring code from the original SipHash implementation. Pull Request: llvm#134197
The emulated PAC runtime functions emulate the ARMv8.3a pointer authentication instructions and are intended for use in heterogeneous testing environments. For more information, see the associated RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-emulated-pac/85557 TODO: - Add tests. Pull Request: llvm#133530
…eeded. This enables the use of IFUNC to implement custom relocation types, such as the PAuth relocation types that will be introduced in a subsequent pull request. TODO: - Add tests. - Fix broken tests. Pull Request: llvm#133531
The -z glibc-228-compat flag is intended to be used for binaries utilizing IFUNCs which need to be compatible with glibc versions containing a bug that was fixed in commit b5c45e83753b27dc538dff2d55d4410c385cf3a4 which was released in version 2.29. The bug causes glibc to mprotect the .text section as RW while calling ifunc resolvers in binaries linked with -z notext, leading to a SIGSEGV at startup time. By setting the W flag on the executable section we work around the bug by avoiding the code path that does the mprotect. It is recommended that binaries linked with this flag contain startup code (e.g. in .init_array) that remaps the executable section as non-writable. TODO: - Add tests. - Possibly decide on another mechanism for enabling this besides the -z flag (e.g. examine symbol version data on libc.so.6). Pull Request: llvm#133532
This supports the following use cases: - ConstantPtrAuth expressions that are unrepresentable using standard PAuth relocations such as expressions involving an integer operand or deactivation symbols. - libc implementations that do not support PAuth relocations. For more information see the RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-structure-protection-a-family-of-uaf-mitigation-techniques/85555 TODO: - Add tests. Pull Request: llvm#133533
The R_AARCH64_INST32 relocation type is to support deactivation symbols. For more information, see the RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-deactivation-symbols/85556 TODO: - Agree on semantics and relocation type number. - Add tests. Pull Request: llvm#133534
This reduces the amount of boilerplate required when adding a new field to MIMetadata and reduces the chance of bugs like the one I fixed in TargetInstrInfo::reassociateOps. Pull Request: llvm#133535
Deactivation symbols are a mechanism for allowing object files to disable specific instructions in other object files at link time. The initial use case is for pointer field protection. For more information, see the RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-deactivation-symbols/85556 TODO: - Add tests. Pull Request: llvm#133536
Deactivation symbol operands are supported in the code generator by building on the previously added support for IRELATIVE relocations. TODO: - Fix broken test. - Add bitcode and IR writer support. - Add tests. Pull Request: llvm#133537
Pointer field protection is a use-after-free vulnerability mitigation that works by changing how data structures' pointer fields are stored in memory. For more information, see the RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-structure-protection-a-family-of-uaf-mitigation-techniques/85555 TODO: - Fix test failure. - Add more tests. - Add documentation. Pull Request: llvm#133538
pcc
reviewed
Apr 4, 2025
pcc
reviewed
Apr 5, 2025
pcc
reviewed
Apr 5, 2025
pcc
reviewed
Apr 5, 2025
pcc
reviewed
Apr 5, 2025
pcc
reviewed
Apr 8, 2025
pcc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2025
…#134130) This should fix failures caused by llvm#133967 Attn: @sarnex Thanks Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam@intel.com>
pcc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2025
…d A520 (llvm#132246) Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add ``` void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of instructions. ``` add x12, x1, x10 ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x13, x2, x10 ld1b { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10] ldr z2, [x12, #1, mul vl] ldr z3, [x13, #1, mul vl] dech x11 add x12, x0, x10 fadd z0.s, z1.s, z0.s fadd z1.s, z3.s, z2.s st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10] addvl x10, x10, #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ``` By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop. ``` ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, llvm#8 ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, llvm#32 add x11, x11, llvm#32 fadd v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] add x12, x12, llvm#32 ``` Which is more efficient.
pcc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2025
… A510/A520 (llvm#134606) Recommit. This work was done by llvm#132246 but failed buildbots due to the test introduced needing updates Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add ``` void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of instructions. ``` add x12, x1, x10 ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x13, x2, x10 ld1b { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10] ldr z2, [x12, #1, mul vl] ldr z3, [x13, #1, mul vl] dech x11 add x12, x0, x10 fadd z0.s, z1.s, z0.s fadd z1.s, z3.s, z2.s st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10] addvl x10, x10, #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ``` By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop. ``` ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, llvm#8 ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, llvm#32 add x11, x11, llvm#32 fadd v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] add x12, x12, llvm#32 ``` Which is more efficient.
pcc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
…ctor-bits=128." (llvm#134997) Reverts llvm#134068 Caused a stage 2 build failure: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/6016 ``` FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp Opcode has unknown scale! UNREACHABLE executed at ../llvm/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp:4530! PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp 1. <eof> parser at end of file 2. Code generation 3. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp'. 4. Running pass 'AArch64 load / store optimization pass' on function '@"_ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFN4llvm8ExpectedISt8functionIFNS1_ISt10unique_ptrINS0_16CachedFileStreamESt14default_deleteIS4_EEEEjRKNS0_5TwineEEEEEjNS0_9StringRefESB_EZNS0_10localCacheESB_SB_SB_S2_IFvjSB_S3_INS0_12MemoryBufferES5_ISH_EEEEE3$_0E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataOjOSF_SB_"' #0 0x0000b6eae9b67bf0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c7bf0) #1 0x0000b6eae9b65aec llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c5aec) #2 0x0000b6eae9acd5f4 CrashRecoverySignalHandler(int) CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:0:0 llvm#3 0x0000f16c1aff28f8 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x8f8) llvm#4 0x0000f16c1aacf1f0 __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 llvm#5 0x0000f16c1aa8a67c gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 llvm#6 0x0000f16c1aa77130 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 llvm#7 0x0000b6eae9ad6628 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x8136628) llvm#8 0x0000b6eae72e95a8 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x59495a8) llvm#9 0x0000b6eae74ca9a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::findMatchingInsn(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>, (anonymous namespace)::LdStPairFlags&, unsigned int, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 llvm#10 0x0000b6eae74c85a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::tryToPairLdStInst(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 llvm#11 0x0000b6eae74c624c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::optimizeBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 llvm#12 0x0000b6eae74c429c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 ```
pcc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
…vailable (llvm#135343) When a frame is inlined, LLDB will display its name in backtraces as follows: ``` * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.3 * frame #0: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] baz(x=10) at inline.cpp:1:42 frame #1: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] bar() at inline.cpp:2:37 frame #2: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() at inline.cpp:4:15 frame llvm#3: 0x00000001000003c0 a.out`main at inline.cpp:7:5 frame llvm#4: 0x000000026eb29ab8 dyld`start + 6812 ``` The longer the names get the more confusing this gets because the first function name that appears is the parent frame. My assumption (which may need some more surveying) is that for the majority of cases we only care about the actual frame name (not the parent). So this patch removes all the special logic that prints the parent frame. Another quirk of the current format is that the inlined frame name does not abide by the `${function.name-XXX}` format variables. We always just print the raw demangled name. With this patch, we would format the inlined frame name according to the `frame-format` setting (see the test-cases). If we really want to have the `parentFrame [inlined] inlinedFrame` format, we could expose it through a new `frame-format` variable (e..g., `${function.inlined-at-name}` and let the user decide where to place things.
pcc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2025
The linter messed up the order of includes, which is necessary as is.
qinkunbao
pushed a commit
to qinkunbao/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2025
The mcmodel=tiny memory model is only valid on ARM targets. While trying this on X86 compiler throws an internal error along with stack dump. llvm#125641 This patch resolves the issue. Reduced test case: ``` #include <stdio.h> int main( void ) { printf( "Hello, World!\n" ); return 0; } ``` ``` 0. Program arguments: /opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang++ -gdwarf-4 -g -o /app/output.s -fno-verbose-asm -S --gcc-toolchain=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot -fcolor-diagnostics -fno-crash-diagnostics -mcmodel=tiny <source> 1. <eof> parser at end of file #0 0x0000000003b10218 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b10218) pcc#1 0x0000000003b0e35c llvm::sys::CleanupOnSignal(unsigned long) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b0e35c) pcc#2 0x0000000003a5dbc3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::HandleExit(int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dbc3) llvm#3 0x0000000003b05cfe llvm::sys::Process::Exit(int, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b05cfe) llvm#4 0x0000000000d4e3eb LLVMErrorHandler(void*, char const*, bool) cc1_main.cpp:0:0 llvm#5 0x0000000003a67c93 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67c93) llvm#6 0x0000000003a67df8 (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67df8) llvm#7 0x0000000002549148 llvm::X86TargetMachine::X86TargetMachine(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x2549148) llvm#8 0x00000000025491fc llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::X86TargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x25491fc) llvm#9 0x0000000003db74cc clang::emitBackendOutput(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::CodeGenOptions&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module*, clang::BackendAction, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::FileSystem>, std::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream, std::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream>>, clang::BackendConsumer*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3db74cc) llvm#10 0x0000000004460d95 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4460d95) llvm#11 0x00000000060005ec clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x60005ec) llvm#12 0x00000000044614b5 clang::CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44614b5) llvm#13 0x0000000004737121 clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4737121) llvm#14 0x00000000046b777b clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x46b777b) llvm#15 0x00000000048229e3 clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x48229e3) llvm#16 0x0000000000d50621 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd50621) llvm#17 0x0000000000d48e2d ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) driver.cpp:0:0 llvm#18 0x00000000044acc99 void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const::'lambda'()>(long) Job.cpp:0:0 llvm#19 0x0000000003a5dac3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dac3) llvm#20 0x00000000044aceb9 clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const (.part.0) Job.cpp:0:0 llvm#21 0x00000000044710dd clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteCommand(clang::driver::Command const&, clang::driver::Command const*&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44710dd) llvm#22 0x0000000004472071 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteJobs(clang::driver::JobList const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4472071) llvm#23 0x000000000447c3fc clang::driver::Driver::ExecuteCompilation(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x447c3fc) llvm#24 0x0000000000d4d2b1 clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd4d2b1) llvm#25 0x0000000000c12464 main (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xc12464) llvm#26 0x00007ae43b029d90 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29d90) llvm#27 0x00007ae43b029e40 __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29e40) llvm#28 0x0000000000d488c5 _start (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd488c5) ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Shashwathi N <nshashwa@pe31.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net>
qinkunbao
pushed a commit
to qinkunbao/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2025
… `getForwardSlice` matchers (llvm#115670) Improve mlir-query tool by implementing `getBackwardSlice` and `getForwardSlice` matchers. As an addition `SetQuery` also needed to be added to enable custom configuration for each query. e.g: `inclusive`, `omitUsesFromAbove`, `omitBlockArguments`. Note: backwardSlice and forwardSlice algoritms are the same as the ones in `mlir/lib/Analysis/SliceAnalysis.cpp` Example of current matcher. The query was made to the file: `mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir` ```mlir ./mlir-query /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir -c "match getDefinitions(hasOpName(\"arith.add f\"),2)" Match pcc#1: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:5:8: %0 = linalg.generic {indexing_maps = [#map, #map], iterator_types = ["parallel", "parallel"]} ins(%arg0 : tensor<5x5xf32>) outs(%arg1 : tensor<5x5xf32>) { ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:7:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %in, %in : f32 ^ Match pcc#2: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:10:16: %collapsed = tensor.collapse_shape %0 [[0, 1]] : tensor<5x5xf32> into tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:13:11: %c2 = arith.constant 2 : index ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:14:18: %extracted = tensor.extract %collapsed[%c2] : tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:15:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %extracted, %extracted : f32 ^ 2 matches. ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tested on both X86_64 and arm64.