You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"The letters/the text is too big in our opinion"
"The drop-down-function to big" (this was lost in translation - Dennis actually meant there was too much scrolling involved in the narrative view)
Scott's two cents: I agree, some entries are incredibly long and the size of the font makes navigation basically impossible. The think I like about Wikipedia and other online encyclopedias (like Stanford Philosophy) is that 1) there is a table of contents and a 'return to TOC' button at the top and bottom of each section, 2) the page/text is wide enough that I don't have to scroll for days, 3) the headings stand out from the text (either because they're significantly larger or more bold and/or because there are other visual cues like lines). If we are wanting people to use this for research (again, like Stanford) then we need to make it easy for people to quickly refer to/find specific information (eg. jump to the 'Influence, Outcomes, and Effects' section, or refer back to Methods and Tools Used from the Analysis & Lessons Learned section).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From Collaborators at KWI:
"The letters/the text is too big in our opinion"
"The drop-down-function to big" (this was lost in translation - Dennis actually meant there was too much scrolling involved in the narrative view)
Scott's two cents: I agree, some entries are incredibly long and the size of the font makes navigation basically impossible. The think I like about Wikipedia and other online encyclopedias (like Stanford Philosophy) is that 1) there is a table of contents and a 'return to TOC' button at the top and bottom of each section, 2) the page/text is wide enough that I don't have to scroll for days, 3) the headings stand out from the text (either because they're significantly larger or more bold and/or because there are other visual cues like lines). If we are wanting people to use this for research (again, like Stanford) then we need to make it easy for people to quickly refer to/find specific information (eg. jump to the 'Influence, Outcomes, and Effects' section, or refer back to Methods and Tools Used from the Analysis & Lessons Learned section).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: