-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Conversation
7071894
to
3ab2293
Compare
2844b75
to
c9da1fe
Compare
c9da1fe
to
a1efb5c
Compare
80153cc
to
32b62cc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dirty, but okay
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
still testing this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like works as expected with all_distinct
@@ -67,6 +68,12 @@ lint: | |||
script: | |||
- pre-commit run --all | |||
|
|||
tests: | |||
<<: *common-refs | |||
stage: unit_test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just ooc, why can't this go into the test
stage together with the security-scan
job?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I decided to keep them separated just because their concerns are different.
Added the author of a PR as an approval. By doing this, if the author is part of the teams that need to review the PR, it will make him count as one required review less.
Fixes #104